[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9754) Global flag to supress transaction propagation for EJB clients inside of an server application
by Fedor Gavrilov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Fedor Gavrilov reassigned WFLY-9754:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Fedor Gavrilov (was: David Lloyd)
> Global flag to supress transaction propagation for EJB clients inside of an server application
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-9754
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9754
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: EJB
> Environment: JEE application inside of WildFly using remote invocation to EJB's deployed in another WildFly instance
> Reporter: Wolf-Dieter Fink
> Assignee: Fedor Gavrilov
>
> The remote interface can be marked with an annotation to control transaction propagation with
> org.jboss.ejb.client.annotation.ClientTransactionPolicy.*
> This can be useful if the application need to ensure a specific Tx behaviour for this combination.
> Remember the client does not know whether the server side is flagged to use Tx or not!
> But there are different issues
> - the Remote interface is polluted with WildFly specific annotations
> consider the interface could be used in an environment without WildFly
> - any call to the remote application should not propagate Tx context
> - any call to a remote server should not propagate a Tx context
> Consider former versions where able to control the Tx propagation by using JTA or JTS
> To have more control for the application assembler or server administrator the transaction propagation should be controlled with deployment descriptor or server configuration.
> possible solutions to disable the Tx propagation
> - add a flag in ejb-client.xml application descriptor (affect this application)
> - add a configuration for remote-outbound-connection (affect this connection including a possible cluster)
> - add a configuration server wide (affect all remote outbound connections)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2770) Edit issue in Guided Decision Tree
by Chaitanya Patel (JIRA)
Chaitanya Patel created DROOLS-2770:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Edit issue in Guided Decision Tree
Key: DROOLS-2770
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2770
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Chaitanya Patel
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Attachments: EditButtonDoesNotWork_DifferentTree.PNG, WorkingDecisionTreeWithEdit.PNG
I have a working Decision Tree having a data object whose edit functionality works fine when we try to click on the circles. I want to add another Decision Tree for a different Data Object but when I try to edit the circles(root object/other objects) in this scenario, the edit functionality does not open a pop up. There is no java script error either. Now I try to add a different data object to the new decision tree but still the edit functionality does not work.
I have moved this decision tree and data object to a different package as well as to a different project. But still the edit button does not open a pop-up. Neither the close(X) button or collapse button work for these circles.
Attaching the snapshots where edit functionality of one decision tree works and it does not work for other.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3973) Upgrade CLI to use aesh-extensions 1.6
by Jean-Francois Denise (JIRA)
Jean-Francois Denise created WFCORE-3973:
--------------------------------------------
Summary: Upgrade CLI to use aesh-extensions 1.6
Key: WFCORE-3973
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3973
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Component Upgrade
Components: CLI
Reporter: Jean-Francois Denise
Assignee: Jean-Francois Denise
An invalid dependency on javafx has been found in aesh-extension. It has been removed in aesh-extensions 1.6
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3962) Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
by Rostislav Svoboda (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Rostislav Svoboda updated WFCORE-3962:
--------------------------------------
Labels: Java11 blocker-WF14 (was: Java11)
> Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3962
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3962
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Modules
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Alpha3
> Reporter: Matej Novotny
> Assignee: David Lloyd
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: Java11, blocker-WF14
>
> As per request, copying MODULES-372 to WFCORE as well.
> Starting WFLY with JDK 11 using {{standalone.sh}} yields:
> {code}
> org.jboss.modules.ModuleNotFoundException: java.se
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.addPaths(Module.java:1266)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.link(Module.java:1622)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.relinkIfNecessary(Module.java:1650)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleLoader.loadModule(ModuleLoader.java:296)
> at org.jboss.modules.Main.main(Main.java:437)
> {code}
> Output of {{java -version}}:
> {code}
> openjdk version "11-ea" 2018-09-25
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11-ea+21)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11-ea+21, mixed mode)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2706) New "Scenario Test" asset list option (UX)
by Stetson Robinson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Stetson Robinson commented on DROOLS-2706:
------------------------------------------
[~g.dey18], this task at this point is basically here to agree on a name for the Simulation Scenario asset and go with that for the asset list and everywhere else in Central. I'll start an email about this to get better group feedback, and then turn over to you from there. The team is not using the same name for this asset consistently, and everyone needs to get on the same page from this point.
> New "Scenario Test" asset list option (UX)
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2706
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2706
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Gaurav Dey
> Labels: UX, UXTeam
>
> As a practitioner - I want to be able to distinguish the new Scenario Test tool option, from the existing one, within the Asset list so that I can quickly/easily create a test using the new editor.
> *Verification conditions:*
> The new Scenario Test tool is distinguishable from the existing test tool within the asset list, through visual inspection by the user (no hover/click required.)
> Notes:
> Need a way to identify "experimental" tools from existing (to be deprecated?) tools. Solution might include distinct names for each, or parenthetical append (e.g. "experimental, beta, preview...) Or visual indicator, such as an icon, flag, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2706) New "Scenario Test" asset list option (UX)
by Stetson Robinson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Stetson Robinson reassigned DROOLS-2706:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Gaurav Dey (was: Stetson Robinson)
> New "Scenario Test" asset list option (UX)
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2706
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2706
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Gaurav Dey
> Labels: UX, UXTeam
>
> As a practitioner - I want to be able to distinguish the new Scenario Test tool option, from the existing one, within the Asset list so that I can quickly/easily create a test using the new editor.
> *Verification conditions:*
> The new Scenario Test tool is distinguishable from the existing test tool within the asset list, through visual inspection by the user (no hover/click required.)
> Notes:
> Need a way to identify "experimental" tools from existing (to be deprecated?) tools. Solution might include distinct names for each, or parenthetical append (e.g. "experimental, beta, preview...) Or visual indicator, such as an icon, flag, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1615) Support for masked passwords in client XML config
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
Darran Lofthouse created ELY-1615:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Support for masked passwords in client XML config
Key: ELY-1615
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1615
Project: WildFly Elytron
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: David Lloyd
Assignee: Jan Kalina
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.4.1.CR1
We need a way to support masked passwords in the auth configuration file, either as:
* A dedicated masked-password-type XML type
* Adding necessary fields to hashed-password-type
* Adding a modular crypt format
Needs to be supported anywhere passwords are allowed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months