[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-4042) "filter-spec" attribute of socket-handler contains non existent "filter" alternative
by Claudio Miranda (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Claudio Miranda updated WFCORE-4042:
------------------------------------
Description:
The socket-handler resource, contains an attribute "filter-spec" and the "alternatives" contains a non existent "filter" attribute
{code}
"filter-spec" => {
"type" => STRING,
"description" => "A filter expression value to define a filter. Example for a filter that does not match a pattern: not(match(\"JBAS.*\"))",
"expressions-allowed" => true,
"required" => false,
"nillable" => true,
"alternatives" => ["filter"],
"min-length" => 1L,
"max-length" => 2147483647L,
"access-type" => "read-write",
"storage" => "configuration",
"restart-required" => "no-services"
},
{code}
I counted the following resources affected by the issue.
{code}
/logging-profile=*/async-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/console-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/custom-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/periodic-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/size-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/socket-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/root-logger=ROOT
/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
/socket-handler=*
{code}
In HAL we use the metadata to validate user input and in this case, we undefine the alternative attribute the user didn't set, "filter", resulting in an error because the attribute doesn't exist. I did a workaround, but would be interesting to fix the alternatives metadata.
was:
The socket-handler resource, contains an attribute "filter-spec" and the "alternatives" contains a non existent "filter" attribute
{code}
"filter-spec" => {
"type" => STRING,
"description" => "A filter expression value to define a filter. Example for a filter that does not match a pattern: not(match(\"JBAS.*\"))",
"expressions-allowed" => true,
"required" => false,
"nillable" => true,
"alternatives" => ["filter"],
"min-length" => 1L,
"max-length" => 2147483647L,
"access-type" => "read-write",
"storage" => "configuration",
"restart-required" => "no-services"
},
{code}
I counted the following resources affected by the issue.
{code}
/logging-profile=*/async-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/console-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/custom-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/periodic-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/size-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/socket-handler=*
/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
/socket-handler=*
{code}
In HAL we use the metadata to validate user input and in this case, we undefine the alternative attribute the user didn't set, "filter", resulting in an error because the attribute doesn't exist. I did a workaround, but would be interesting to fix the alternatives metadata.
> "filter-spec" attribute of socket-handler contains non existent "filter" alternative
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-4042
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4042
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Logging
> Reporter: Claudio Miranda
> Assignee: James Perkins
>
> The socket-handler resource, contains an attribute "filter-spec" and the "alternatives" contains a non existent "filter" attribute
> {code}
> "filter-spec" => {
> "type" => STRING,
> "description" => "A filter expression value to define a filter. Example for a filter that does not match a pattern: not(match(\"JBAS.*\"))",
> "expressions-allowed" => true,
> "required" => false,
> "nillable" => true,
> "alternatives" => ["filter"],
> "min-length" => 1L,
> "max-length" => 2147483647L,
> "access-type" => "read-write",
> "storage" => "configuration",
> "restart-required" => "no-services"
> },
> {code}
> I counted the following resources affected by the issue.
> {code}
> /logging-profile=*/async-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/console-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/custom-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/periodic-rotating-file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/size-rotating-file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/socket-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/root-logger=ROOT
> /periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
> /socket-handler=*
> {code}
> In HAL we use the metadata to validate user input and in this case, we undefine the alternative attribute the user didn't set, "filter", resulting in an error because the attribute doesn't exist. I did a workaround, but would be interesting to fix the alternatives metadata.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-4042) "filter-spec" attribute of socket-handler contains non existent "filter" alternative
by Claudio Miranda (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Claudio Miranda updated WFCORE-4042:
------------------------------------
Description:
The socket-handler resource, contains an attribute "filter-spec" and the "alternatives" contains a non existent "filter" attribute
{code}
"filter-spec" => {
"type" => STRING,
"description" => "A filter expression value to define a filter. Example for a filter that does not match a pattern: not(match(\"JBAS.*\"))",
"expressions-allowed" => true,
"required" => false,
"nillable" => true,
"alternatives" => ["filter"],
"min-length" => 1L,
"max-length" => 2147483647L,
"access-type" => "read-write",
"storage" => "configuration",
"restart-required" => "no-services"
},
{code}
I counted the following resources affected by the issue.
{code}
/logging-profile=*/async-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/console-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/custom-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/periodic-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/size-rotating-file-handler=*
/logging-profile=*/socket-handler=*
/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
/socket-handler=*
{code}
In HAL we use the metadata to validate user input and in this case, we undefine the alternative attribute the user didn't set, "filter", resulting in an error because the attribute doesn't exist. I did a workaround, but would be interesting to fix the alternatives metadata.
was:
The socket-handler resource, contains an attribute "filter-spec" and the "alternatives" contains a non existent "filter" attribute
{code}
"filter-spec" => {
"type" => STRING,
"description" => "A filter expression value to define a filter. Example for a filter that does not match a pattern: not(match(\"JBAS.*\"))",
"expressions-allowed" => true,
"required" => false,
"nillable" => true,
"alternatives" => ["filter"],
"min-length" => 1L,
"max-length" => 2147483647L,
"access-type" => "read-write",
"storage" => "configuration",
"restart-required" => "no-services"
},
{code}
In HAL we use the metadata to validate user input and in this case, we undefine the alternative attribute the user didn't set, "filter", resulting in an error because the attribute doesn't exist. I did a workaround, but would be interesting to fix the alternatives metadata.
> "filter-spec" attribute of socket-handler contains non existent "filter" alternative
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-4042
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4042
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Logging
> Reporter: Claudio Miranda
> Assignee: James Perkins
>
> The socket-handler resource, contains an attribute "filter-spec" and the "alternatives" contains a non existent "filter" attribute
> {code}
> "filter-spec" => {
> "type" => STRING,
> "description" => "A filter expression value to define a filter. Example for a filter that does not match a pattern: not(match(\"JBAS.*\"))",
> "expressions-allowed" => true,
> "required" => false,
> "nillable" => true,
> "alternatives" => ["filter"],
> "min-length" => 1L,
> "max-length" => 2147483647L,
> "access-type" => "read-write",
> "storage" => "configuration",
> "restart-required" => "no-services"
> },
> {code}
> I counted the following resources affected by the issue.
> {code}
> /logging-profile=*/async-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/console-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/custom-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/periodic-rotating-file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/size-rotating-file-handler=*
> /logging-profile=*/socket-handler=*
> /periodic-size-rotating-file-handler=*
> /socket-handler=*
> {code}
> In HAL we use the metadata to validate user input and in this case, we undefine the alternative attribute the user didn't set, "filter", resulting in an error because the attribute doesn't exist. I did a workaround, but would be interesting to fix the alternatives metadata.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2889) Research accessibility considerations for Data Type list drag-n-drop.
by Sarah Rambacher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Sarah Rambacher commented on DROOLS-2889:
-----------------------------------------
Is it a fair assumption that an item cannot be dragged out of its nested list into a different nested list? E.g. in the attached screen shot, street, city name, or postal code *could* be re-ordered within tAddress, but *could not* be dragged up a level to tPerson or out to another item at the same level as tAddress?
> Research accessibility considerations for Data Type list drag-n-drop.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2889
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2889
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Sarah Rambacher
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2018-08-13 at 1.42.16 PM.png
>
>
> Use Case: As a DMN user I will want to be able to reorder the list of Custom data types so that I can arrange data types in a logical order.
> Notes:
> * The Data Type dialog leverage the following PR list pattern:
> https://www.patternfly.org/pattern-library/content-views/tree-list-view
> * The list will need to be re-orderable, there is an open design jira to determine the interaction options for that feature.
> * Design is currently being iterated upon, but last iteration wireframes are posted at: https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/B7NEEUSV539
> Verification conditions:
> * Research results summarized in the jira or a linked google doc., etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months