[JBoss JIRA] (WFWIP-119) [Artemis 2.x upgrade] Lost message in replicated HA scenario with MDB
by Clebert Suconic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Clebert Suconic commented on WFWIP-119:
---------------------------------------
again, 207 failed for messages on the output Queue on nodeD while the test is not looking for it in there:
from print-data:
queue id 116,count=1492
> [Artemis 2.x upgrade] Lost message in replicated HA scenario with MDB
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFWIP-119
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-119
> Project: WildFly WIP
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Artemis
> Reporter: Erich Duda
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Blocker
>
> *Scenario*
> * Start live/backup pair in replicated dedicated topology and start one more server which is in Artemis cluster with live.
> * Send messages to queue InQueue.
> * Start another server with MDB connected to cluster with live server which resend messages from InQueue to OutQueue.
> * Stop backup server and then live server.
> * Stop server which was in cluster with live server.
> * Start live server and server in cluster.
> * Start backup server.
> The test fails because one message get lost. It wasn't sent to OutQueue.
> Logs from failed test including traces you can find in \[1\].
> \[1\] https://eap-qe-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/eap-7.x-messag...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFWIP-119) [Artemis 2.x upgrade] Lost message in replicated HA scenario with MDB
by Clebert Suconic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Clebert Suconic commented on WFWIP-119:
---------------------------------------
I started another build: https://eap-qe-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/eap-7.x-messag...
But these tests keep failing for a test issue.
[~eduda] Can you help me clearing this test up so I can eliminate that noise?
Also: the test stopped the replica before live when I ran manually. Do you know in what circunstance that happens? I am playing with some possible options on clearing up tokens, but I need to understand this first.
> [Artemis 2.x upgrade] Lost message in replicated HA scenario with MDB
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFWIP-119
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-119
> Project: WildFly WIP
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Artemis
> Reporter: Erich Duda
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Blocker
>
> *Scenario*
> * Start live/backup pair in replicated dedicated topology and start one more server which is in Artemis cluster with live.
> * Send messages to queue InQueue.
> * Start another server with MDB connected to cluster with live server which resend messages from InQueue to OutQueue.
> * Stop backup server and then live server.
> * Stop server which was in cluster with live server.
> * Start live server and server in cluster.
> * Start backup server.
> The test fails because one message get lost. It wasn't sent to OutQueue.
> Logs from failed test including traces you can find in \[1\].
> \[1\] https://eap-qe-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/eap-7.x-messag...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFWIP-119) [Artemis 2.x upgrade] Lost message in replicated HA scenario with MDB
by Clebert Suconic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Clebert Suconic commented on WFWIP-119:
---------------------------------------
This last failure on 126 was the same thing... messages were on node4 and the count check did not work.
> [Artemis 2.x upgrade] Lost message in replicated HA scenario with MDB
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFWIP-119
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-119
> Project: WildFly WIP
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Artemis
> Reporter: Erich Duda
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Blocker
>
> *Scenario*
> * Start live/backup pair in replicated dedicated topology and start one more server which is in Artemis cluster with live.
> * Send messages to queue InQueue.
> * Start another server with MDB connected to cluster with live server which resend messages from InQueue to OutQueue.
> * Stop backup server and then live server.
> * Stop server which was in cluster with live server.
> * Start live server and server in cluster.
> * Start backup server.
> The test fails because one message get lost. It wasn't sent to OutQueue.
> Logs from failed test including traces you can find in \[1\].
> \[1\] https://eap-qe-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/eap-7.x-messag...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2874) Select a data type, inline, from DMN decision tables.
by Michael Anstis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis commented on DROOLS-2874:
----------------------------------------
[~uxdlc] Yes, in the screenshot example "Decision-1" is the default (generated) name of the Decision node in the graph view; and yes it's expression is defined as a LiteralExpression; and yes it's Output data-type is "number". Finally, yes the drop-down for data-type supports "live search" (it uses the exact widget you linked).
> Select a data type, inline, from DMN decision tables.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2874
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2874
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DataType selection ('Properties Panel' and 'in-grid').png, Screen Shot 2018-08-10 at 10.23.36 AM.png, select.png
>
>
> *Background*
> Persona: Business analyst or Rules practitioner
> Use Cases:
> * From the DMN canvas view - as a user I want to *select* a data type inline from a decision table.
> *
> Functional considerations/ pre conditions:
> * Actions will be offered or spawned inline within the cells of decision tables.
> * Design needs to be consistent with Stunner and PF components.
> Verification conditions:
> * Scrum team and PO review.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 11 months