[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3022) [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
by Guilherme Carreiro (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Carreiro updated DROOLS-3022:
---------------------------------------
Description:
The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
- tPerson
-- uuid
-- name
-- city (Structure)
--- uuid
--- name
The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
---
Prototype: !validation.png|thumbnail!
was:
The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
- tPerson
-- uuid
-- name
-- city (Structure)
--- uuid
--- name
The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
> [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3022
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3022
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
> Assignee: Guilherme Carreiro
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: validation.png
>
>
> The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
> - tPerson
> -- uuid
> -- name
> -- city (Structure)
> --- uuid
> --- name
> The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
> ---
> Prototype: !validation.png|thumbnail!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3022) [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
by Guilherme Carreiro (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Carreiro updated DROOLS-3022:
---------------------------------------
Description:
The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
- tPerson
-- uuid
-- name
-- city (Structure)
--- uuid
--- name
The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
---
Prototype:
!validation.png|thumbnail!
was:
The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
- tPerson
-- uuid
-- name
-- city (Structure)
--- uuid
--- name
The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
---
Prototype: !validation.png|thumbnail!
> [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3022
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3022
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
> Assignee: Guilherme Carreiro
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: validation.png
>
>
> The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
> - tPerson
> -- uuid
> -- name
> -- city (Structure)
> --- uuid
> --- name
> The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
> ---
> Prototype:
> !validation.png|thumbnail!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3022) [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
by Guilherme Carreiro (JIRA)
Guilherme Carreiro created DROOLS-3022:
------------------------------------------
Summary: [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
Key: DROOLS-3022
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3022
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Task
Components: DMN Editor
Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
Assignee: Guilherme Carreiro
The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
- tPerson
-- uuid
-- name
-- city (Structure)
--- uuid
--- name
The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3022) [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
by Guilherme Carreiro (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Carreiro updated DROOLS-3022:
---------------------------------------
Description:
The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
- tPerson
-- uuid
-- name
-- city (Structure)
--- uuid
--- name
The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
was:
The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
- tPerson
-- uuid
-- name
-- city (Structure)
--- uuid
--- name
The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
> [DMN Designer] Data Types - Validations - Validate the uniqueness of a Data Type name
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3022
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3022
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
> Assignee: Guilherme Carreiro
> Labels: drools-tools
>
> The Data Type name must be unique at the level that it's defined; e.g.
> - tPerson
> -- uuid
> -- name
> -- city (Structure)
> --- uuid
> --- name
> The Data Type above is valid, because _tPerson.uuid_ and _tPerson.city.uuid_ are in different levels.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2293) Graceful concurrent leaving of coordinator(s) leaves the cluster with stale views
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban edited comment on JGRP-2293 at 9/24/18 9:09 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------
Reducing the timeout on FD_ALL helps: {{new FD_ALL().timeout(3000).interval(1000)}}.
I have to investigate whether this is a bug or not, as the first and second in line leaving at the same time is something that will probably have to solved by failure detection.
I'll look into this this week.
was (Author: belaban):
Reducing the timeout on FD_ALL helps: {{ new FD_ALL().timeout(3000).interval(1000)}}.
I have to investigate whether this is a bug or not, as the first and second in line leaving at the same time is something that will probably have to solved by failure detection.
I'll look into this this week.
> Graceful concurrent leaving of coordinator(s) leaves the cluster with stale views
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2293
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2293
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.14
> Reporter: Radoslav Husar
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.0.15
>
>
> JGroups does not handle concurrent leaving of nodes correctly. This is a typical use case in cloud environment when scaled down with an autoscaler/manually which we need to handle.
> A simple test can be devised which fails first n (where n>1) nodes from a cluster, reproducer PR https://github.com/belaban/JGroups/pull/397
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2293) Graceful concurrent leaving of coordinator(s) leaves the cluster with stale views
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-2293:
--------------------------------
Reducing the timeout on FD_ALL helps: {{ new FD_ALL().timeout(3000).interval(1000)}}.
I have to investigate whether this is a bug or not, as the first and second in line leaving at the same time is something that will probably have to solved by failure detection.
I'll look into this this week.
> Graceful concurrent leaving of coordinator(s) leaves the cluster with stale views
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2293
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2293
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.14
> Reporter: Radoslav Husar
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.0.15
>
>
> JGroups does not handle concurrent leaving of nodes correctly. This is a typical use case in cloud environment when scaled down with an autoscaler/manually which we need to handle.
> A simple test can be devised which fails first n (where n>1) nodes from a cluster, reproducer PR https://github.com/belaban/JGroups/pull/397
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3021) [DMN Designer] Data Types - Constraints - Enumeration option component
by Guilherme Carreiro (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Carreiro updated DROOLS-3021:
---------------------------------------
Story Points: 8 (was: 5)
> [DMN Designer] Data Types - Constraints - Enumeration option component
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3021
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3021
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
> Assignee: Guilherme Carreiro
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: enumaration-component.png
>
>
> - When "Enumeration" is selected in the _Base Component_, the _Enumeration component_ must be loaded;
> - The _Enumeration component_ is an input that creates "tags" when the user presses "Enter", the UI component must look like this:
> !enumaration-component.png|thumbnail!
> - The field (for creating a tag), must show the appropriated widget for each type of data (Number, Day/Time Duration, Year/Mos Duration, Date/Time, Date, Time);
> - When the user clicks in a tag, it must be removed.
> - When the user clicks in the Data Type "Save" button, the values (tags) must be persisted in the Data Type.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
7 years, 9 months