[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-10937) Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
by James Perkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
James Perkins commented on WFLY-10937:
--------------------------------------
Can you attach you're {{standlone.conf.bat}} file?
> Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-10937
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10937
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scripts
> Reporter: Marek Kopecký
> Assignee: Richard Opalka
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: Java11, blocker-WF14, jdk11
> Fix For: 15.0.0.Beta1, 15.0.0.Final
>
>
> Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
> *Affected scripts*
> * appclient
> * jdr
> * wsconsume
> * wsprovide
> *Example of logs*
> {noformat}
> [mkopecky@dhcp-10-40-4-197 bin]$ ./jdr.sh
> org.jboss.modules.ModuleNotFoundException: java.se
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.addPaths(Module.java:1266)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.link(Module.java:1622)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.relinkIfNecessary(Module.java:1650)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleLoader.loadModule(ModuleLoader.java:296)
> at org.jboss.modules.Main.main(Main.java:437)
> [mkopecky@dhcp-10-40-4-197 bin]$
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-554) Add missing Openshift API calls
by Hayk Hovsepyan (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Hayk Hovsepyan updated SWSQE-554:
---------------------------------
Summary: Add missing Openshift API calls (was: Add missing Openshit API calls)
> Add missing Openshift API calls
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-554
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-554
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Hayk Hovsepyan
> Assignee: Hayk Hovsepyan
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently there are several areas in UI tests that do not have call to Openshift API for data comparison.
> 1. Figure out which calls are missing to Openshift.
> 2. Create API call.
> 3. Create assertions on that results to compare with UI data.
> 4. PR per area (API call).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3559) executable-model misses to raise an error for a non-exisiting method with Mvel dialect
by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)
Toshiya Kobayashi created DROOLS-3559:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: executable-model misses to raise an error for a non-exisiting method with Mvel dialect
Key: DROOLS-3559
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3559
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: executable model
Affects Versions: 7.16.0.Final
Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
Assignee: Luca Molteni
When a rule has a non-existing method in RHS modify block with mvel dialect, executable-model misses to raise an error so the rule is compiled.
{noformat}
rule R
when
$p : Person()
then
modify($p) {likes = nonExistingMethod()};
end
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-10937) Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
by Suganya Rajeswaran (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Suganya Rajeswaran commented on WFLY-10937:
-------------------------------------------
[~jamezp] I tried it... getting the same exception as below.
org.jboss.modules.ModuleNotFoundException: java.se
at org.jboss.modules.Module.addPaths(Module.java:1266)
at org.jboss.modules.Module.link(Module.java:1622)
at org.jboss.modules.Module.relinkIfNecessary(Module.java:1650)
at org.jboss.modules.ModuleLoader.loadModule(ModuleLoader.java:296)
at org.jboss.modules.Main.main(Main.java:437)
> Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-10937
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10937
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scripts
> Reporter: Marek Kopecký
> Assignee: Richard Opalka
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: Java11, blocker-WF14, jdk11
> Fix For: 15.0.0.Beta1, 15.0.0.Final
>
>
> Starting WFLY scripts with JDK 11 blows up with ModuleNotFoundException java.se
> *Affected scripts*
> * appclient
> * jdr
> * wsconsume
> * wsprovide
> *Example of logs*
> {noformat}
> [mkopecky@dhcp-10-40-4-197 bin]$ ./jdr.sh
> org.jboss.modules.ModuleNotFoundException: java.se
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.addPaths(Module.java:1266)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.link(Module.java:1622)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.relinkIfNecessary(Module.java:1650)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleLoader.loadModule(ModuleLoader.java:296)
> at org.jboss.modules.Main.main(Main.java:437)
> [mkopecky@dhcp-10-40-4-197 bin]$
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3558) "NoSuchElementException: No value present" with executable-model, Map and binding
by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Toshiya Kobayashi commented on DROOLS-3558:
-------------------------------------------
Unit test PR sent
https://github.com/kiegroup/drools/pull/2231
> "NoSuchElementException: No value present" with executable-model, Map and binding
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3558
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3558
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: executable model
> Affects Versions: 7.16.0.Final
> Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
> Assignee: Luca Molteni
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
>
> When compiling a below rule with executable-model:
> {noformat}
> rule R1
> when
> $p : Person()
> $a : Address(number == $p.items[1])
> then
> end
> {noformat}
> it fails with the following error:
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 165, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 3, Time elapsed: 20.794 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.drools.modelcompiler.CompilerTest
> [ERROR] testMapWithBinding[FLOW_DSL](org.drools.modelcompiler.CompilerTest) Time elapsed: 0.02 s <<< ERROR!
> java.util.NoSuchElementException: No value present
> at java.util.Optional.get(Optional.java:135)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.expressiontyper.ExpressionTyper.toTypedExpressionFromMethodCallOrField(ExpressionTyper.java:397)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.expressiontyper.ExpressionTyper.toTypedExpressionRec(ExpressionTyper.java:211)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.expressiontyper.ExpressionTyper.toTypedExpression(ExpressionTyper.java:108)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.drlxparse.ConstraintParser.parseBinaryExpr(ConstraintParser.java:295)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.drlxparse.ConstraintParser.getDrlxParseResult(ConstraintParser.java:111)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.drlxparse.ConstraintParser.drlxParse(ConstraintParser.java:78)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.pattern.PatternDSL.findAllConstraint(PatternDSL.java:124)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.pattern.PatternDSL.buildPattern(PatternDSL.java:191)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.ModelGeneratorVisitor.visit(ModelGeneratorVisitor.java:128)
> at org.drools.compiler.lang.descr.PatternDescr.accept(PatternDescr.java:267)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.AndVisitor.visit(AndVisitor.java:29)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.ModelGeneratorVisitor.visit(ModelGeneratorVisitor.java:69)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.ModelGenerator.processRule(ModelGenerator.java:174)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.ModelGenerator.generateModel(ModelGenerator.java:154)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.ModelBuilderImpl.compileKnowledgePackages(ModelBuilderImpl.java:144)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.ModelBuilderImpl.buildRules(ModelBuilderImpl.java:94)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.ModelBuilderImpl.buildPackages(ModelBuilderImpl.java:63)
> at org.drools.compiler.builder.impl.CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.build(CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:108)
> at org.drools.compiler.builder.impl.CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.build(CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:100)
> at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.AbstractKieProject.buildKnowledgePackages(AbstractKieProject.java:257)
> at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.AbstractKieProject.verify(AbstractKieProject.java:74)
> at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildKieProject(KieBuilderImpl.java:267)
> at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildAll(KieBuilderImpl.java:235)
> at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildAll(KieBuilderImpl.java:204)
> at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildAll(KieBuilderImpl.java:192)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.createKieBuilder(BaseModelTest.java:142)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.createKieBuilder(BaseModelTest.java:125)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieContainer(BaseModelTest.java:114)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieContainer(BaseModelTest.java:107)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieSession(BaseModelTest.java:103)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieSession(BaseModelTest.java:99)
> at org.drools.modelcompiler.CompilerTest.testMapWithBinding(CompilerTest.java:1457)
> ...
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3558) "NoSuchElementException: No value present" with executable-model, Map and binding
by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)
Toshiya Kobayashi created DROOLS-3558:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: "NoSuchElementException: No value present" with executable-model, Map and binding
Key: DROOLS-3558
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3558
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: executable model
Affects Versions: 7.16.0.Final
Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
Assignee: Luca Molteni
When compiling a below rule with executable-model:
{noformat}
rule R1
when
$p : Person()
$a : Address(number == $p.items[1])
then
end
{noformat}
it fails with the following error:
{noformat}
[ERROR] Tests run: 165, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 3, Time elapsed: 20.794 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.drools.modelcompiler.CompilerTest
[ERROR] testMapWithBinding[FLOW_DSL](org.drools.modelcompiler.CompilerTest) Time elapsed: 0.02 s <<< ERROR!
java.util.NoSuchElementException: No value present
at java.util.Optional.get(Optional.java:135)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.expressiontyper.ExpressionTyper.toTypedExpressionFromMethodCallOrField(ExpressionTyper.java:397)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.expressiontyper.ExpressionTyper.toTypedExpressionRec(ExpressionTyper.java:211)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.expressiontyper.ExpressionTyper.toTypedExpression(ExpressionTyper.java:108)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.drlxparse.ConstraintParser.parseBinaryExpr(ConstraintParser.java:295)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.drlxparse.ConstraintParser.getDrlxParseResult(ConstraintParser.java:111)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.drlxparse.ConstraintParser.drlxParse(ConstraintParser.java:78)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.pattern.PatternDSL.findAllConstraint(PatternDSL.java:124)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.pattern.PatternDSL.buildPattern(PatternDSL.java:191)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.ModelGeneratorVisitor.visit(ModelGeneratorVisitor.java:128)
at org.drools.compiler.lang.descr.PatternDescr.accept(PatternDescr.java:267)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.AndVisitor.visit(AndVisitor.java:29)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.visitor.ModelGeneratorVisitor.visit(ModelGeneratorVisitor.java:69)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.ModelGenerator.processRule(ModelGenerator.java:174)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.generator.ModelGenerator.generateModel(ModelGenerator.java:154)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.ModelBuilderImpl.compileKnowledgePackages(ModelBuilderImpl.java:144)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.ModelBuilderImpl.buildRules(ModelBuilderImpl.java:94)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.builder.ModelBuilderImpl.buildPackages(ModelBuilderImpl.java:63)
at org.drools.compiler.builder.impl.CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.build(CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:108)
at org.drools.compiler.builder.impl.CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.build(CompositeKnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:100)
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.AbstractKieProject.buildKnowledgePackages(AbstractKieProject.java:257)
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.AbstractKieProject.verify(AbstractKieProject.java:74)
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildKieProject(KieBuilderImpl.java:267)
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildAll(KieBuilderImpl.java:235)
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildAll(KieBuilderImpl.java:204)
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieBuilderImpl.buildAll(KieBuilderImpl.java:192)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.createKieBuilder(BaseModelTest.java:142)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.createKieBuilder(BaseModelTest.java:125)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieContainer(BaseModelTest.java:114)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieContainer(BaseModelTest.java:107)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieSession(BaseModelTest.java:103)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.BaseModelTest.getKieSession(BaseModelTest.java:99)
at org.drools.modelcompiler.CompilerTest.testMapWithBinding(CompilerTest.java:1457)
...
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3556) 'update' works differently than 'modify' when using dialect "mvel" with property reactive
by Hiroko Miura (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Hiroko Miura updated DROOLS-3556:
---------------------------------
Description:
Behavior of 'update' is different from 'modify' when dialect "mvel" is used with property reactive.
In case of reproducer, when using update() after fact modification, the rule is continuously executed even though the condition no longer match.(i.e. re-evaluation does not work as expected)
was:
Behavior of 'update' is different from 'modify' when dialect "mvel" is sued with property reactive.
When using update() after fact modification, the same rule is continuously executed even though the condition no longer match.
> 'update' works differently than 'modify' when using dialect "mvel" with property reactive
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3556
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3556
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.14.0.Final
> Environment: - Red Hat Decision Manager
> - 7.2.0
> Reporter: Hiroko Miura
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
> Attachments: updatePropertyReactive.zip
>
>
> Behavior of 'update' is different from 'modify' when dialect "mvel" is used with property reactive.
> In case of reproducer, when using update() after fact modification, the rule is continuously executed even though the condition no longer match.(i.e. re-evaluation does not work as expected)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3557) 'update' works differently than 'modify' when using dialect "mvel" with property reactive
by Hiroko Miura (Jira)
Hiroko Miura created DROOLS-3557:
------------------------------------
Summary: 'update' works differently than 'modify' when using dialect "mvel" with property reactive
Key: DROOLS-3557
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3557
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core engine
Affects Versions: 7.14.0.Final
Environment: - Red Hat Decision Manager
- 7.2.0
Reporter: Hiroko Miura
Assignee: Mario Fusco
Attachments: updatePropertyReactive.zip
Behavior of 'update' is different from 'modify' when dialect "mvel" is sued with property reactive.
When using update() after fact modification, the same rule is continuously executed even though the condition no longer match.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3556) 'update' works differently than 'modify' when using dialect "mvel" with property reactive
by Hiroko Miura (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Hiroko Miura updated DROOLS-3556:
---------------------------------
Summary: 'update' works differently than 'modify' when using dialect "mvel" with property reactive (was: behavior of update is different from modify with dialect "mvel" + property reactive)
> 'update' works differently than 'modify' when using dialect "mvel" with property reactive
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3556
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3556
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.14.0.Final
> Environment: - Red Hat Decision Manager
> - 7.2.0
> Reporter: Hiroko Miura
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
> Attachments: updatePropertyReactive.zip
>
>
> Behavior of 'update' is different from 'modify' when dialect "mvel" is sued with property reactive.
> When using update() after fact modification, the same rule is continuously executed even though the condition no longer match.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months