[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3887) Smarter range validation error messages
by Michal Petrov (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michal Petrov commented on WFCORE-3887:
---------------------------------------
[~brian.stansberry] is this still needed? The error message with this wording (WFLYCTL0107) is not in use as far as I can tell. The error messages used in Int/LongRangeValidator are "A minimum/maximum value of %d is required".
> Smarter range validation error messages
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3887
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3887
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Minor
>
> A message like this is kind of silly: "Value must be between 0 and 9007199254740991".
> Smarter would be the ParameterValidator code that detects the message checking if the range max is Integer.MAX_INT (for an int) or Long.MAX_LONG (for a long) and if the bad value is below the max, just saying the equivalent of "Value must be greater than %d".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-634) Setup Kubernetes Cluster on Packet for Security Audit
by Kevin Earls (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Kevin Earls commented on SWSQE-634:
-----------------------------------
Hi [~objectiser] I think [~gbaufake] will be working on this. He has asked if you just need a vanilla kubernetes implementation here or something more specific.
Also, can you give him access to the project? Thanks.
> Setup Kubernetes Cluster on Packet for Security Audit
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-634
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-634
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Kevin Earls
> Priority: Major
> Labels: infrastructure
>
> [~objectiser] has requested we setup a Kubernetes cluster with Jaeger installed via the operator on Packet. This is needed for a security audit of Jaeger which will be done by a third party at the beginning of April.
> I will need admin help with this when someone is available.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1769) Transforming raw passwords missing some SCRAM algorithms
by Darran Lofthouse (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Darran Lofthouse updated ELY-1769:
----------------------------------
Summary: Transforming raw passwords missing some SCRAM algorithms (was: Transforming raw passwords missing some SCRAM and Digest algorithms)
> Transforming raw passwords missing some SCRAM algorithms
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-1769
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1769
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Passwords
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.9.0.CR1
>
>
> Due to commit 3de6a6985408f443a0b3f6fb41b3dee18a2b0aec
> * -ALGORITHM_DIGEST_SHA_384- Already added under ELY-1304
> * ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_384
> * ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_512
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1769) Transforming raw passwords missing some SCRAM and Digest algorithms
by Darran Lofthouse (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Darran Lofthouse updated ELY-1769:
----------------------------------
Description:
Due to commit 3de6a6985408f443a0b3f6fb41b3dee18a2b0aec
* -ALGORITHM_DIGEST_SHA_384- Already added under ELY-1304
* ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_384
* ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_512
was:
Due to commit 3de6a6985408f443a0b3f6fb41b3dee18a2b0aec
* ALGORITHM_DIGEST_SHA_384
* ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_384
* ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_512
> Transforming raw passwords missing some SCRAM and Digest algorithms
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-1769
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1769
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Passwords
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.9.0.CR1
>
>
> Due to commit 3de6a6985408f443a0b3f6fb41b3dee18a2b0aec
> * -ALGORITHM_DIGEST_SHA_384- Already added under ELY-1304
> * ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_384
> * ALGORITHM_SCRAM_SHA_512
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11871) abstract classes with @EJB annotation included in libraries will cause deployment failures
by Wolf-Dieter Fink (Jira)
Wolf-Dieter Fink created WFLY-11871:
---------------------------------------
Summary: abstract classes with @EJB annotation included in libraries will cause deployment failures
Key: WFLY-11871
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11871
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: EJB, Server
Reporter: Wolf-Dieter Fink
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
If an archive include libraries with interfaces and abstract classes the deployment will fail if there are annotations for injection like @EJB.
Only if the injected EJB is available within the deployed file (or any other deployment) it is possible to deploy it.
As the abstract class can not cause any instance the failure does not make sense.
Also former versions are deploying the same file correct and work fine.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 3 months