[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3731) DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Gomes edited comment on DROOLS-3731 at 6/12/19 4:17 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi [~uxdlc],
Thanks for the mockups [~zhutaojiajia].
IIUC what [~tirelli] commented, we have two types of scenarios:
- when a single test is executed:
!single.gif|thumbnail!
- and when several tests are executed:
!multi.gif|thumbnail!
The mockup that [~zhutaojiajia] proposed seem to cover both scenarios above:
!屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png|thumbnail!
Personally, I think it's important to use some colors (red/yellow/green) here:
!colors.png|thumbnail!
..to show which element is passes, and which element does not work as expected.
Regarding the use of popovers. As we can see in the GIFs above, we already have some useful popovers in the test scenario. So, it's just a matter o checking with the PO if they are enough (as a user, I think that they are enough) ;-)
was (Author: karreiro):
Hi [~uxdlc],
Thanks for the mockups [~zhutaojiajia].
IIUC what [~tirelli] commented, we have two types of scenarios:
- when a single test is executed:
!single.gif|thumbnail!
- and when several tests are executed:
!multi.gif|thumbnail!
The mockup you proposed seems cover both scenarios above:
!屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png|thumbnail!
Personally, I think it's important to use some colors (red/yellow/green) here:
!colors.png|thumbnail!
..to show which element is passes, and which element does not work as expected.
Regarding the use of popovers. As we can see in the GIFs above, we already have some useful popovers in the test scenario. So, it's just a matter o checking with the PO if they are enough (as a user, I think that they are enough) ;-)
> DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3731
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton
> Assignee: Tao Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-05-29 at 2.49.21 PM.png, colors.png, download (1).png, download.png, multi.gif, single.gif, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.02.19.png, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png
>
>
> As a practitioner, there are situations where I need to show additional information about a model... for instance: test coverage report: I need to draw a model and color code the nodes to show which nodes were executed by tests, or which rows on a DT were a match. Or when I execute a single test, what was the actual value of a given node or expression.
> Note: Maybe in read-only mode with an "overlay" on top of the model the additional metadata information. See process instance diagram design examples.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3731) DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Gomes commented on DROOLS-3731:
-----------------------------------------
Hi [~uxdlc],
Thanks for the mockups [~zhutaojiajia].
IIUC what [~tirelli] commented, we have two types of scenarios:
- When a single test can be executed:
!single.gif|thumbnail!
- and when several tests are executed:
!multi.gif|thumbnail!
The mockup you proposed seems cover both scenarios above:
!屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png|thumbnail!
Personally, I think it's important to use some colors (red/yellow/green) here:
!colors.png|thumbnail!
..to show which element is passes, and which element does not work as expected.
Regarding the use of popovers. As we can see in the GIFs above, we already have some useful popovers in the test scenario. So, it's just a matter o checking with the PO if they are enough (as a user, I think that they are enough) ;-)
> DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3731
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton
> Assignee: Tao Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-05-29 at 2.49.21 PM.png, colors.png, download (1).png, download.png, multi.gif, single.gif, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.02.19.png, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png
>
>
> As a practitioner, there are situations where I need to show additional information about a model... for instance: test coverage report: I need to draw a model and color code the nodes to show which nodes were executed by tests, or which rows on a DT were a match. Or when I execute a single test, what was the actual value of a given node or expression.
> Note: Maybe in read-only mode with an "overlay" on top of the model the additional metadata information. See process instance diagram design examples.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3731) DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-3731:
------------------------------------
Attachment: colors.png
> DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3731
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton
> Assignee: Tao Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-05-29 at 2.49.21 PM.png, colors.png, download (1).png, download.png, multi.gif, single.gif, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.02.19.png, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png
>
>
> As a practitioner, there are situations where I need to show additional information about a model... for instance: test coverage report: I need to draw a model and color code the nodes to show which nodes were executed by tests, or which rows on a DT were a match. Or when I execute a single test, what was the actual value of a given node or expression.
> Note: Maybe in read-only mode with an "overlay" on top of the model the additional metadata information. See process instance diagram design examples.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3731) DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-3731:
------------------------------------
Attachment: single.gif
> DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3731
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton
> Assignee: Tao Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-05-29 at 2.49.21 PM.png, download (1).png, download.png, multi.gif, single.gif, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.02.19.png, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png
>
>
> As a practitioner, there are situations where I need to show additional information about a model... for instance: test coverage report: I need to draw a model and color code the nodes to show which nodes were executed by tests, or which rows on a DT were a match. Or when I execute a single test, what was the actual value of a given node or expression.
> Note: Maybe in read-only mode with an "overlay" on top of the model the additional metadata information. See process instance diagram design examples.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3731) DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-3731:
------------------------------------
Attachment: multi.gif
> DMN UX - More info overlaid on models.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3731
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3731
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton
> Assignee: Tao Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-05-29 at 2.49.21 PM.png, download (1).png, download.png, multi.gif, single.gif, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.02.19.png, 屏幕快照 2019-06-11 下午3.10.26.png
>
>
> As a practitioner, there are situations where I need to show additional information about a model... for instance: test coverage report: I need to draw a model and color code the nodes to show which nodes were executed by tests, or which rows on a DT were a match. Or when I execute a single test, what was the actual value of a given node or expression.
> Note: Maybe in read-only mode with an "overlay" on top of the model the additional metadata information. See process instance diagram design examples.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-4521) add-user script fails when there is no domain configuration
by Brian Stansberry (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry edited comment on WFCORE-4521 at 6/12/19 2:46 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is PropertyFileFinder is invoking the validatePermissions check on files that don't exist, and those checks fail not because of missing perms but because you can't read or execute non-existing files. The validatePermissions checks are called from findFiles, which is already dealing with non-existing files (i.e. not adding them to the foundFiles list and returning false if no files exist) so I don't see a reason to validate non-existing files.
was (Author: brian.stansberry):
Using add-user.sh fails:
{code}$ bin/add-user.sh
What type of user do you wish to add?
a) Management User (mgmt-users.properties)
b) Application User (application-users.properties)
(a): a
* Error *
WFLYDM0106: File permissions problems found while attempting to update /home/bes/dev/wildfly/wildfly-core/build/target/wildfly-core-9.0.1.Final/domain/configuration/mgmt-users.properties file.
{code}
The problem is PropertyFileFinder is invoking the validatePermissions check on files that don't exist, and those checks fail not because of missing perms but because you can't read or execute non-existing files. The validatePermissions checks are called from findFiles, which is already dealing with non-existing files (i.e. not adding them to the foundFiles list and returning false if no files exist) so I don't see a reason to validate non-existing files.
> add-user script fails when there is no domain configuration
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-4521
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4521
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Management, Scripts
> Affects Versions: 9.0.1.Final
> Environment: OS Darwin Kernel Version 17.7.0
> Java 1.8.0_192-ea
> WildFly Full 17.0.0.Final (WildFly Core 9.0.1.Final)
> Reporter: Rafael Soares
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Blocker
>
> When you have a wildfly installation with no domain configuration directory (WILDFLY_HOME/domain) the {{bin/add-user.sh}} fails because it expects both (standalone and domain) configs to exists in order to update the properties file...
> It seems this behavior is fixed in the code implementation at [org.jboss.as.domain.management.security.adduser.AddUser.java|https://gith...]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 1 month