July 2019 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-4585) Not working configured SSL using legacy security-realm in ManagementRealm on host.xml

by Darran Lofthouse (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Darran Lofthouse reassigned WFCORE-4585: ---------------------------------------- Assignee: (was: Darran Lofthouse) > Not working configured SSL using legacy security-realm in ManagementRealm on host.xml > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-4585 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4585 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security > Environment: tried in Linux version RHEL 7.2 > Reporter: Tarak A > Priority: Major > > Hi Team, > We need your suggestion to fix SSL configuration issue in legacy security-realm in ManagementRealm on host.xml, and it is causing not to start master node with legacy SSL settings in Wildfly 17.0.1 Final version. Below are the example setting we used to configure,same settings working in Wildfly 15.0.1. > SSL > <security-realm name="ManagementRealm"> > <server-identities> > <ssl> > <keystore path="server.jks" relative-to="jboss.server.config.dir" keystore-password="keystore_password" alias="server" key-password="key_password" /> > </ssl> > </server-identities> > <authentication> > <truststore path="server.jks" relative-to="jboss.server.config.dir" keystore-password="truststore_password" /> > <local default-user="$local"/> > <properties path="application-users.properties" relative-to="jboss.server.config.dir"/> > </authentication> > </security-realm> -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4305) getOldObject() of ObjectUpdatedEvent is returning same value as getObject()

by Benoit Proulx (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Benoit Proulx commented on DROOLS-4305: --------------------------------------- During a drools update/modify command, which will trigger the ObjectUpdatedEvent, we're always going to change the values of an existing instance. So I don't see the point of having "getOldObject()" if it's always going to reference the same instance as "getObject()" > getOldObject() of ObjectUpdatedEvent is returning same value as getObject() > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4305 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4305 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core engine > Affects Versions: 7.16.0.Final > Environment: Windows 10 Version 1803 (OS Build 17134.829) > Eclipse 2018-12 (4.10.0) > jdk1.8.0_171 > Apache Maven 3.5.0 (ff8f5e7444045639af65f6095c62210b5713f426; 2017-04-03T15:39:06-04:00) > spring-boot-starter-parent 2.1.2.RELEASE > Reporter: Benoit Proulx > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Priority: Optional > > We have built a logger file for our rules that implements org.kie.api.event.rule.RuleRuntimeEventListener. > Whenever the objectUpdated(ObjectUpdatedEvent) method is called, the ObjectUpdatedEvent contains the values of both the old Object and new object (or getOldObject() and getObject() ) > However, it seems that getOldObject() is always returning the same value as getObject(). > Having both values would be very helpful in debugging rules. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBLOGGING-141) At Logger.getMessageLogger, safeguard the doPrivileged call by a SecurityManager check

by James Perkins (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBLOGGING-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ] James Perkins updated JBLOGGING-141: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.3.3.Final > At Logger.getMessageLogger, safeguard the doPrivileged call by a SecurityManager check > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBLOGGING-141 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBLOGGING-141 > Project: JBoss Logging > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Flavia Rainone > Assignee: Flavia Rainone > Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.3.3.Final, 3.4.1.Final > > > Prevent the extra cost of invoking doPrivileged when SecurityManager is null -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12332) Basic integration tests for OCSP

by Jan Stourac (Jira)

Jan Stourac created WFLY-12332: ---------------------------------- Summary: Basic integration tests for OCSP Key: WFLY-12332 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12332 Project: WildFly Issue Type: Bug Components: Security Reporter: Jan Stourac Assignee: Jan Stourac Let's provide integration tests for OCSP feature into WildFly testsuite. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4346) Provide fixed code for Kie Client usage in docs

by Edoardo Vacchi (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Edoardo Vacchi updated DROOLS-4346: ----------------------------------- Story Points: 3 > Provide fixed code for Kie Client usage in docs > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4346 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4346 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Edoardo Vacchi > Assignee: Edoardo Vacchi > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-core > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/BXMSDOC-4259 code for client usage does not compile, throws exception -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12331) Skip redundant put operations when distributable SFSBs use local, non-persistent cache configuration

by Paul Ferraro (Jira)

Paul Ferraro created WFLY-12331: ----------------------------------- Summary: Skip redundant put operations when distributable SFSBs use local, non-persistent cache configuration Key: WFLY-12331 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12331 Project: WildFly Issue Type: Bug Components: Clustering, EJB Affects Versions: 17.0.1.Final Reporter: Paul Ferraro Assignee: Paul Ferraro When a distributable SFSB is released, we perform a cache put to ensure state is persisted/replicated. However, when the cache configuration is both local and non-persistent, this cache operation is redundant. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4342) Using BigDecimal with From Accumulate causes an "Error: argument type mismatch"

by Luca Molteni (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Luca Molteni updated DROOLS-4342: --------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 7.25.0.Final > Using BigDecimal with From Accumulate causes an "Error: argument type mismatch" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4342 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4342 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: kie server > Environment: Red Hat Process Automation Manager (RHPAM) 7.2.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Ribeiro > Assignee: Luca Molteni > Priority: Major > Labels: BigDecimal, DRL, bigdecimal, drl, kie-server, rhpam, rule > Fix For: 7.25.0.Final > > Attachments: reproducer-02425606.zip, request.json, testSum.scenario > > > When written a rule that does a sum using ‘from accumulate’. The rule validates successfully. However, when trying to test it, is returned a very generic error message: Error: argument type mismatch. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4342) Using BigDecimal with From Accumulate causes an "Error: argument type mismatch"

by Karina Varela (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Karina Varela commented on DROOLS-4342: --------------------------------------- Hi team, [~volothamp] can we please set the fix version of this JIRA? :) Thanks a lot!! > Using BigDecimal with From Accumulate causes an "Error: argument type mismatch" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4342 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4342 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: kie server > Environment: Red Hat Process Automation Manager (RHPAM) 7.2.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Ribeiro > Assignee: Luca Molteni > Priority: Major > Labels: BigDecimal, DRL, bigdecimal, drl, kie-server, rhpam, rule > Attachments: reproducer-02425606.zip, request.json, testSum.scenario > > > When written a rule that does a sum using ‘from accumulate’. The rule validates successfully. However, when trying to test it, is returned a very generic error message: Error: argument type mismatch. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4372) DMN Editor Data type usability study: design assets

by Elizabeth Clayton (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Elizabeth Clayton updated DROOLS-4372: -------------------------------------- Sprint: 2019 Week 29-31 > DMN Editor Data type usability study: design assets > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4372 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4372 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Components: DMN Editor > Environment: Version 7.4 > Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton > Assignee: Elizabeth Clayton > Priority: Major > Labels: UX, UXTeam, Usability, drools-tools > > Description: > * Create a study plan outline. > * Review usability study materials. > * Create a click-thru wireframe prototype for a lightweight usability study to test the ease of use in viewing, creating, editing and deleting data types, particularly structured data types. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-852) Filter out test and mock files from coverage

by Filip Brychta (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Filip Brychta updated SWSQE-852: -------------------------------- Description: Following files are included: tests/data/destination_rules_data.go tests/data/gateway_data.go tests/data/mesh_policy_data.go tests/data/policy_data.go tests/data/service_entry_data.go tests/data/service_role_data.go tests/data/virtual_service_data.go tests/data/workload_data.go kubernetes/kubetest/mock.go kubernetes/kiali_monitoring/mock/mock.go prometheus/prometheustest/mock.go business/test_util.go We need to filter those out. was: Following files are included: tests/data/destination_rules_data.go tests/data/gateway_data.go tests/data/mesh_policy_data.go tests/data/policy_data.go tests/data/service_entry_data.go tests/data/service_role_data.go tests/data/virtual_service_data.go tests/data/workload_data.go kubernetes/kubetest/mock.go kubernetes/kiali_monitoring/mock/mock.go prometheus/prometheustest/mock.go We need to filter those out. > Filter out test and mock files from coverage > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: SWSQE-852 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-852 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Filip Brychta > Assignee: Filip Brychta > Priority: Major > Labels: infrastructure > > Following files are included: > tests/data/destination_rules_data.go > tests/data/gateway_data.go > tests/data/mesh_policy_data.go > tests/data/policy_data.go > tests/data/service_entry_data.go > tests/data/service_role_data.go > tests/data/virtual_service_data.go > tests/data/workload_data.go > kubernetes/kubetest/mock.go > kubernetes/kiali_monitoring/mock/mock.go > prometheus/prometheustest/mock.go > business/test_util.go > We need to filter those out. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

6 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira July 2019