[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2380) Sometimes cluster members are not discovered when using TCPGOSSIP
by Bela Ban (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban updated JGRP-2380:
---------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.1.5
Can you try this with the latest stable release (4.1.4)?
> Sometimes cluster members are not discovered when using TCPGOSSIP
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2380
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2380
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.19
> Reporter: Pavlo Fedyna
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1.5
>
> Attachments: jgroups.xml, logs_failure.txt, logs_success.txt
>
>
> Sometimes new member can't join existing cluster if TCPGOSSIP is used with use_nio property set to true. In such case new member creates its own cluster with only one member of itself. After some period of time MERGE3 protocol merges these two clusters into one, but if min_interval/max_interval values are large, it may take a while.
> For some reason, first try of initial discovery always finishes due to join_timeout. In this case only a few members are discovered with no coordinator.
> If we are lucky enough, GMS prints following log message: "I (WO-KIT-967-28892) am not the first of the nodes, waiting for another client to become coordinator" and makes second attempt to join cluster which now takes a few milliseconds and succeeds (see logs_success.txt). In case of failure, GMS prints "I (WO-KIT-967-14786) am the first of the nodes, will become coordinator" and creates new cluster with only one member (see logs_failure.txt).
> The expectations are that first try of the initial discovery should not fail due to the timeout and it should be as fast as the second one is.
> Workaround: set use_nio to false (or just remove it from the stack configuration)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.5#713005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12529) DefaultConcurrencyCDITestCase fails on JDK11 with secman due to lack of permissions
by Ivan Straka (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Ivan Straka updated WFLY-12529:
-------------------------------
Summary: DefaultConcurrencyCDITestCase fails on JDK11 with secman due to lack of permissions (was: DefaultConcurrencyCDITestCase fails with secman due to lack of permissions)
> DefaultConcurrencyCDITestCase fails on JDK11 with secman due to lack of permissions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-12529
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12529
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test Suite
> Affects Versions: 18.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Ivan Straka
> Assignee: Ivan Straka
> Priority: Major
>
> org.jboss.as.test.integration.ee.naming.defaultbindings.concurrency.DefaultConcurrencyCDITestCase.testCDI fails on JDK11 with secman. This happens because the bean calls WildFlySecurityManager.getCurrentContextClassLoaderPrivileged() but misses the permission.
> {code:java}
> java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.security.AccessControlException: WFSM000001: Permission check failed (permission "("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "getClassLoader")" in code source "(vfs:/content/c264f3c9-b4f6-48c0-8158-ecbbe92937b6.jar <no signer certificates>)" of "ModuleClassLoader for Module "deployment.c264f3c9-b4f6-48c0-8158-ecbbe92937b6.jar" from Service Module Loader")
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:191)
> at deployment.c264f3c9-b4f6-48c0-8158-ecbbe92937b6.jar//org.jboss.as.test.integration.ee.naming.defaultbindings.concurrency.DefaultConcurrencyTestCDIBean.test(DefaultConcurrencyTestCDIBean.java:72)
> at deployment.c264f3c9-b4f6-48c0-8158-ecbbe92937b6.jar//org.jboss.as.test.integration.ee.naming.defaultbindings.concurrency.DefaultConcurrencyCDITestCase.testCDI(DefaultConcurrencyCDITestCase.java:57)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$8$1.invokeMethod(Arquillian.java:325)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.MethodInvoker$1.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:18)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.execution.LocalTestExecuter.execute(LocalTestExecuter.java:57)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor29.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:90)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:133)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:105)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:62)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.execution.ContainerTestExecuter.execute(ContainerTestExecuter.java:36)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor28.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:90)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createTestContext(TestContextHandler.java:116)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor10.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createClassContext(TestContextHandler.java:83)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor9.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:69)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor8.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:133)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.test(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:139)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:15)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$8.evaluate(Arquillian.java:332)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$4.evaluate(Arquillian.java:204)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.multiExecute(Arquillian.java:350)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.access$200(Arquillian.java:54)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$5.evaluate(Arquillian.java:215)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$7$1.invoke(Arquillian.java:279)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.execution.BeforeLifecycleEventExecuter.on(BeforeLifecycleEventExecuter.java:34)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor11.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:90)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createTestContext(TestContextHandler.java:116)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor10.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createClassContext(TestContextHandler.java:83)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor9.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:69)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor8.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:133)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:105)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.fireCustomLifecycle(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:159)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$7.evaluate(Arquillian.java:273)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$2.evaluate(Arquillian.java:166)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.multiExecute(Arquillian.java:350)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.access$200(Arquillian.java:54)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$3.evaluate(Arquillian.java:177)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:115)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:115)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.junit.container.JUnitTestRunner.execute(JUnitTestRunner.java:61)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.protocol.jmx.JMXTestRunner.doRunTestMethod(JMXTestRunner.java:153)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.as.arquillian.service.ArquillianService$ExtendedJMXTestRunner.doRunTestMethod(ArquillianService.java:200)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.protocol.jmx.JMXTestRunner.runTestMethodInternal(JMXTestRunner.java:137)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.arquillian.protocol.jmx.JMXTestRunner.runTestMethod(JMXTestRunner.java:119)
> at deployment.arquillian-service//org.jboss.as.arquillian.service.ArquillianService$ExtendedJMXTestRunner.runTestMethod(ArquillianService.java:176)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor18.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline.invoke(MethodUtil.java:71)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor13.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at java.base/sun.reflect.misc.MethodUtil.invoke(MethodUtil.java:260)
> at java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.StandardMBeanIntrospector.invokeM2(StandardMBeanIntrospector.java:112)
> at java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.StandardMBeanIntrospector.invokeM2(StandardMBeanIntrospector.java:46)
> at java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MBeanIntrospector.invokeM(MBeanIntrospector.java:237)
> at java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.PerInterface.invoke(PerInterface.java:138)
> at java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MBeanSupport.invoke(MBeanSupport.java:252)
> at java.management/com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.invoke(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:809)
> at java.management/com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.invoke(JmxMBeanServer.java:801)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.jmx.PluggableMBeanServerImpl$TcclMBeanServer.invoke(PluggableMBeanServerImpl.java:1475)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.jmx.PluggableMBeanServerImpl.invoke(PluggableMBeanServerImpl.java:724)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.jmx.BlockingNotificationMBeanServer.invoke(BlockingNotificationMBeanServer.java:168)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.jmx.AuthorizingMBeanServer.invoke(AuthorizingMBeanServer.java:258)
> at org.jboss.remoting-jmx@3.0.3.Final//org.jboss.remotingjmx.protocol.v2.ServerProxy$InvokeHandler.handle(ServerProxy.java:950)
> at org.jboss.remoting-jmx@3.0.3.Final//org.jboss.remotingjmx.protocol.v2.ServerCommon$MessageReciever$1$1.run(ServerCommon.java:153)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.jmx.ServerInterceptorFactory$Interceptor$1.run(ServerInterceptorFactory.java:71)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.jmx.ServerInterceptorFactory$Interceptor$1.run(ServerInterceptorFactory.java:66)
> at org.wildfly.security.elytron-private@1.10.0.CR6//org.wildfly.security.auth.server.SecurityIdentity.runAs(SecurityIdentity.java:313)
> at org.wildfly.security.elytron-private@1.10.0.CR6//org.wildfly.security.auth.server.SecurityIdentity.runAs(SecurityIdentity.java:270)
> at org.jboss.as.controller@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.controller.AccessAuditContext.doAs(AccessAuditContext.java:254)
> at org.jboss.as.controller@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.controller.AccessAuditContext.doAs(AccessAuditContext.java:225)
> at org.jboss.as.jmx@10.0.0.Beta5//org.jboss.as.jmx.ServerInterceptorFactory$Interceptor.handleEvent(ServerInterceptorFactory.java:66)
> at org.jboss.remoting-jmx@3.0.3.Final//org.jboss.remotingjmx.protocol.v2.ServerCommon$MessageReciever$1.run(ServerCommon.java:149)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: WFSM000001: Permission check failed (permission "("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "getClassLoader")" in code source "(vfs:/content/c264f3c9-b4f6-48c0-8158-ecbbe92937b6.jar <no signer certificates>)" of "ModuleClassLoader for Module "deployment.c264f3c9-b4f6-48c0-8158-ecbbe92937b6.jar" from Service Module Loader")
> at org.wildfly.security.elytron-private@1.10.0.CR6//org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.checkPDPermission(WildFlySecurityManager.java:1112)
> at org.wildfly.security.elytron-private@1.10.0.CR6//org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.getCurrentContextClassLoaderPrivileged(WildFlySecurityManager.java:1257)
> at deployment.c264f3c9-b4f6-48c0-8158-ecbbe92937b6.jar//org.jboss.as.test.integration.ee.naming.defaultbindings.concurrency.DefaultConcurrencyTestCDIBean.lambda$test$0(DefaultConcurrencyTestCDIBean.java:69)
> at org.jboss.as.ee@18.0.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT//org.jboss.as.ee.concurrent.ControlPointUtils$ControlledRunnable.run(ControlPointUtils.java:105)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> at org.glassfish.javax.enterprise.concurrent//org.glassfish.enterprise.concurrent.internal.ManagedFutureTask.run(ManagedFutureTask.java:141)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> at org.glassfish.javax.enterprise.concurrent//org.glassfish.enterprise.concurrent.ManagedThreadFactoryImpl$ManagedThread.run(ManagedThreadFactoryImpl.java:250)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.5#713005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4518) Implement UX styles for Test Coverage Report
by Daniele Zonca (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Daniele Zonca commented on DROOLS-4518:
---------------------------------------
[~uxdlc]
The HTML/CSS provided doesn't look like the screenshot attached as you can see [here|http://bpam-frontend.surge.sh/drools-test-editor-coverage.html#0] (click on the pie chart icon on the right)
!Screenshot from 2019-09-10 17-52-00.png|thumbnail!
We just removed some of the buttons (View Diagrams, Decision Table) because the implementation [has been postponed|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/BAPL-1379] and the other differences are related to the different setup we are using: business central CSS/JS is not aligned with the one in the sample project [~srambach] is using
What is the desired target?
> Implement UX styles for Test Coverage Report
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-4518
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4518
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton
> Assignee: Daniele Zonca
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-09-10 at 9.35.23 AM.png, Screen Shot 2019-09-10 at 9.37.02 AM.png, Screenshot from 2019-09-10 17-52-00.png
>
>
> The implemented styles for the Test Coverage Report panel do not align with the HTML/CSS provided in jira https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3741.
> The styles used in the current implementation might present usability concerns - the Decision/Scenario list type size is very small and could pose a readability issue. The layout and alignment of the test summary data is difficult to scan, due to the gutter alignment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.5#713005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2327) UNICAST3: create receiver table when non-first message is received first
by Bela Ban (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-2327:
--------------------------------
We could experiment with simply caching messages with the correct conn_id and - when the Table in ReceiverEntry has been received - adding those cached messages to it and purging the cache.
> UNICAST3: create receiver table when non-first message is received first
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2327
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2327
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.1.5
>
>
> * A and B
> * B sends 2 messages to A: B1 and B2
> * A receives B2 _before_ B1 (both B1 and B2 are OOB)
> * The current code has A drop B2 and B1 and send a SEND_FIRST_SEQNO message to B
> * B resends B1, but _not_ B2
> * Retransmission needs to kick in before A receives B2. This might take up to {{xmit_interval * 2}} ms before B2 is retransmitted and delivered
> h4. Scenario (JGRP-2293):
> * A installs a new view
> * B sends a LEAVE-REQ to A (B is leaving, too) on the view installation and a VIEW-ACK for the view. Both messages are unicasts to A and OOB
> * The VIEW-ACK (B2) is received first and dropped, so it will have to be retransmitted
> * This delays the view installation, as A waits for {{view_ack_collection_timeout}} ms until it has received all VIEW-ACKs
> h4. Workaround
> * Set GMS.leave_timeout to a higher value (say 8000ms)
> h4. Solution
> * When B2 is received, and it is not the first message and we don't have a receiver table for B yet, investigate whether we can create the receiver table anyway
> * However, this requires the first seqno from B *to always be 0*
> --> Investigate whether the first seqno in UNICAST3 is always 0, then this solution will work
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.5#713005)
6 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4518) Implement UX styles for Test Coverage Report
by Daniele Zonca (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Daniele Zonca updated DROOLS-4518:
----------------------------------
Attachment: Screenshot from 2019-09-10 17-52-00.png
> Implement UX styles for Test Coverage Report
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-4518
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-4518
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Elizabeth Clayton
> Assignee: Daniele Zonca
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2019-09-10 at 9.35.23 AM.png, Screen Shot 2019-09-10 at 9.37.02 AM.png, Screenshot from 2019-09-10 17-52-00.png
>
>
> The implemented styles for the Test Coverage Report panel do not align with the HTML/CSS provided in jira https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3741.
> The styles used in the current implementation might present usability concerns - the Decision/Scenario list type size is very small and could pose a readability issue. The layout and alignment of the test summary data is difficult to scan, due to the gutter alignment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.5#713005)
6 years, 10 months