[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5188) [DMN Designer] Some DT Analysis messages does not appears
by Michael Anstis (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Michael Anstis updated DROOLS-5188:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: DROOLS-5188.png
> [DMN Designer] Some DT Analysis messages does not appears
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-5188
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5188
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.33.0.Final
> Reporter: Donato Marrazzo
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: DROOLS-5188.png
>
>
> Masked rule validation are dropped by the DMN Editor validation.
> Reproducer:
> https://github.com/dmarrazzo/dmn-validation
> Running the test: (src/test/java/test/Validation.java)
> {noformat}
> Message [id=0, level=INFO, path=null, line=22, column=-1
> text=DMN: Decision Table Analysis of table 'risk category' finished with no messages to be reported. (DMN id: _E72BD036-C550-4992-AA6D-A8AD4666C63A, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis) ]
> Message [id=0, level=INFO, path=null, line=71, column=-1
> text=DMN: Overlap observed: Overlap values: [ >=18, [ "low" .. "medium" ], true ] for rules: [2, 1] (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Overlap Analysis) ]
> Message [id=0, level=ERROR, path=null, line=71, column=-1
> text=DMN: Rule 1 is masked by rule: 2 (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Masked Rule Analysis) ]
> Message [id=0, level=WARNING, path=null, line=71, column=-1
> text=DMN: Rule 2 is a misleading rule. It could be misleading over other rules, such as rule: 1 (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Misleading Rule Analysis) ]
> {noformat}
> Running the validation against masked-rules.dmn in the business central, there are no messages and the green validation notification appears in the corner.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5188) [DMN Designer] Some DT Analysis messages does not appears
by Michael Anstis (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Michael Anstis updated DROOLS-5188:
-----------------------------------
Labels: drools-tools (was: )
> [DMN Designer] Some DT Analysis messages does not appears
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-5188
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5188
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.33.0.Final
> Reporter: Donato Marrazzo
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
>
> Masked rule validation are dropped by the DMN Editor validation.
> Reproducer:
> https://github.com/dmarrazzo/dmn-validation
> Running the test: (src/test/java/test/Validation.java)
> {noformat}
> Message [id=0, level=INFO, path=null, line=22, column=-1
> text=DMN: Decision Table Analysis of table 'risk category' finished with no messages to be reported. (DMN id: _E72BD036-C550-4992-AA6D-A8AD4666C63A, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis) ]
> Message [id=0, level=INFO, path=null, line=71, column=-1
> text=DMN: Overlap observed: Overlap values: [ >=18, [ "low" .. "medium" ], true ] for rules: [2, 1] (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Overlap Analysis) ]
> Message [id=0, level=ERROR, path=null, line=71, column=-1
> text=DMN: Rule 1 is masked by rule: 2 (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Masked Rule Analysis) ]
> Message [id=0, level=WARNING, path=null, line=71, column=-1
> text=DMN: Rule 2 is a misleading rule. It could be misleading over other rules, such as rule: 1 (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Misleading Rule Analysis) ]
> {noformat}
> Running the validation against masked-rules.dmn in the business central, there are no messages and the green validation notification appears in the corner.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5188) [DMN Designer] Some DT Analysis messages does not appears
by Donato Marrazzo (Jira)
Donato Marrazzo created DROOLS-5188:
---------------------------------------
Summary: [DMN Designer] Some DT Analysis messages does not appears
Key: DROOLS-5188
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5188
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: DMN Editor
Affects Versions: 7.33.0.Final
Reporter: Donato Marrazzo
Assignee: Michael Anstis
Masked rule validation are dropped by the DMN Editor validation.
Reproducer:
https://github.com/dmarrazzo/dmn-validation
Running the test: (src/test/java/test/Validation.java)
{noformat}
Message [id=0, level=INFO, path=null, line=22, column=-1
text=DMN: Decision Table Analysis of table 'risk category' finished with no messages to be reported. (DMN id: _E72BD036-C550-4992-AA6D-A8AD4666C63A, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis) ]
Message [id=0, level=INFO, path=null, line=71, column=-1
text=DMN: Overlap observed: Overlap values: [ >=18, [ "low" .. "medium" ], true ] for rules: [2, 1] (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Overlap Analysis) ]
Message [id=0, level=ERROR, path=null, line=71, column=-1
text=DMN: Rule 1 is masked by rule: 2 (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Masked Rule Analysis) ]
Message [id=0, level=WARNING, path=null, line=71, column=-1
text=DMN: Rule 2 is a misleading rule. It could be misleading over other rules, such as rule: 1 (DMN id: _69960A30-BC04-480D-9A65-A3D739A01879, DMN Validation, Decision Table Analysis, Misleading Rule Analysis) ]
{noformat}
Running the validation against masked-rules.dmn in the business central, there are no messages and the green validation notification appears in the corner.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-10137) EJB lookup over HTTP fails if object is used in the signiture
by Peter Craddoock (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-10137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Peter Craddoock commented on WFLY-10137:
----------------------------------------
I have provided the steps to reproduce I have no standalone example for you
> EJB lookup over HTTP fails if object is used in the signiture
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-10137
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-10137
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB, Remoting
> Affects Versions: 11.0.0.Final
> Reporter: peter craddock
> Assignee: Parul Sharma
> Priority: Major
>
> I have a swing client that makes calls to the EJB tier via RMI the majority of the calls work fine using the workaround from WFLY-9636.
> The following calls was failing when connected over HTTP but was fine when using the original TCP connection
> public EntityList getAllWorkingSetsForCube( ModelRef modelRef, FinanceCubeRef financeCubeRef, int userId, Integer[] allowedStates )
> I worked round this and found that creating a method without the Integer[] as part of the signature works.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-13263) Cannot remove extension jwt-smallrye
by Darran Lofthouse (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-13263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Darran Lofthouse commented on WFLY-13263:
-----------------------------------------
Could you please clarify what is the issue being reported here?
Are you reporting there is an error being reported for a specific deployment or an error removing the subsystem?
I have just tried on a local build here and the removal is happening and I am then able to reload the server.
> Cannot remove extension jwt-smallrye
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-13263
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-13263
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: MP JWT
> Affects Versions: 19.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Szymon Klepacz
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot_22.png
>
>
> Cannot remove extension jwt-smallrye with Jboss-cli.
> Starting WilFly 19 with this extension result sin WARNINGS:
> 09:46:44,129 INFO [org.jboss.weld.deployer] (MSC service thread 1-1) WFLYWELD0003: Processing weld deployment XXXX.ear
> 09:46:44,391 WARN [org.jboss.modules.define] (MSC service thread 1-1) Failed to define class org.wildfly.security.mp.jwt.JWTCDIExtension in Module "deployment.XXXX.ear" from Service Module Loader: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Failed to link org/wildfly/security/mp/jwt/JWTCDIExtension (Module "deployment.XXXX.ear" from Service Module Loader): io/smallrye/jwt/auth/cdi/SmallRyeJWTAuthCDIExtension
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(ClassLoader.java)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader._jr$defineClass(ClassLoader.java:763)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:42016)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:839)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.doDefineOrLoadClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:424)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.defineClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:555)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.loadClassLocal(ModuleClassLoader.java:339)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader$1.loadClassLocal(ModuleClassLoader.java:126)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.loadModuleClass(Module.java:731)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.findClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:247)
> at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClassUnchecked(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:410)
> at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:398)
> at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.loadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:116)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.deployment.processors.WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.loadExtension(WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.java:129)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.deployment.processors.WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.loadAttachments(WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.java:115)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.deployment.processors.WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.deploy(WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.java:79)
> at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitPhaseService.start(DeploymentUnitPhaseService.java:176)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.startService(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1738)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.execute(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1700)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$ControllerTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1558)
> at org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1982)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1486)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1377)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> 09:46:44,392 WARN [org.jboss.weld.deployer] (MSC service thread 1-1) WFLYWELD0007: Could not load portable extension class org.wildfly.security.mp.jwt.JWTCDIExtension: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Failed to link org/wildfly/security/mp/jwt/JWTCDIExtension (Module "deployment.XXX.ear" from Service Module Loader): io/smallrye/jwt/auth/cdi/SmallRyeJWTAuthCDIExtension
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(ClassLoader.java)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader._jr$defineClass(ClassLoader.java:763)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:42016)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:839)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.doDefineOrLoadClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:424)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.defineClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:555)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.loadClassLocal(ModuleClassLoader.java:339)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader$1.loadClassLocal(ModuleClassLoader.java:126)
> at org.jboss.modules.Module.loadModuleClass(Module.java:731)
> at org.jboss.modules.ModuleClassLoader.findClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:247)
> at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClassUnchecked(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:410)
> at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.performLoadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:398)
> at org.jboss.modules.ConcurrentClassLoader.loadClass(ConcurrentClassLoader.java:116)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.deployment.processors.WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.loadExtension(WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.java:129)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.deployment.processors.WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.loadAttachments(WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.java:115)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.deployment.processors.WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.deploy(WeldPortableExtensionProcessor.java:79)
> at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitPhaseService.start(DeploymentUnitPhaseService.java:176)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.startService(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1738)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.execute(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1700)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$ControllerTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1558)
> at org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1982)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1486)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1377)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-4607) DMN DT Analysis for symbols
by Matteo Mortari (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Matteo Mortari updated DROOLS-4607:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2019 Week 41-43 (from Okt 7), 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28), 2019 Week 47-49 (from Nov 18), 2020 Week 13-15 (from Mar 23) (was: 2019 Week 41-43 (from Okt 7), 2019 Week 44-46 (from Okt 28), 2019 Week 47-49 (from Nov 18), 2020 Week 10-12 (from Mar 2))
> DMN DT Analysis for symbols
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-4607
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4607
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: dmn engine
> Reporter: Matteo Mortari
> Assignee: Matteo Mortari
> Priority: Major
>
> Extend analysis to symbolic processing in the possible cases
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5045) [DMN Designer] Marshaller does not support DMN1.2 DecisionTable RuleAnnotation
by Jozef Marko (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Jozef Marko updated DROOLS-5045:
--------------------------------
Description:
DMN1.2 has RuleAnnotation in the DecisionTable expression.
Our marshallers (-backend and -client) do not support it and use the Expression's Description element for the DecisionRule description column. We also need to enhance the UI to support adding/deleting additional RuleAnnotations.
Accordingly to the spec has no evaluation semantic. User can put in any value. is only text like "code comments.
was:
DMN1.2 has RuleAnnotation in the DecisionTable expression.
Our marshallers (-backend and -client) do not support it and use the Expression's Description element for the DecisionRule description column. We also need to enhance the UI to support adding/deleting additional RuleAnnotations.
> [DMN Designer] Marshaller does not support DMN1.2 DecisionTable RuleAnnotation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-5045
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5045
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: DMN Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.33.0.Final
> Reporter: Michael Anstis
> Assignee: Daniel José dos Santos
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
>
> DMN1.2 has RuleAnnotation in the DecisionTable expression.
> Our marshallers (-backend and -client) do not support it and use the Expression's Description element for the DecisionRule description column. We also need to enhance the UI to support adding/deleting additional RuleAnnotations.
> Accordingly to the spec has no evaluation semantic. User can put in any value. is only text like "code comments.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5045) [DMN Designer] Marshaller does not support DMN1.2 DecisionTable RuleAnnotation
by Jozef Marko (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Jozef Marko updated DROOLS-5045:
--------------------------------
Description:
DMN1.2 has RuleAnnotation in the DecisionTable expression.
Our marshallers (-backend and -client) do not support it and use the Expression's Description element for the DecisionRule description column. We also need to enhance the UI to support adding/deleting additional RuleAnnotations.
Accordingly to the spec has no evaluation semantic. User can put in any value. is only text like "code comments".
was:
DMN1.2 has RuleAnnotation in the DecisionTable expression.
Our marshallers (-backend and -client) do not support it and use the Expression's Description element for the DecisionRule description column. We also need to enhance the UI to support adding/deleting additional RuleAnnotations.
Accordingly to the spec has no evaluation semantic. User can put in any value. is only text like "code comments.
> [DMN Designer] Marshaller does not support DMN1.2 DecisionTable RuleAnnotation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-5045
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5045
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: DMN Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.33.0.Final
> Reporter: Michael Anstis
> Assignee: Daniel José dos Santos
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
>
> DMN1.2 has RuleAnnotation in the DecisionTable expression.
> Our marshallers (-backend and -client) do not support it and use the Expression's Description element for the DecisionRule description column. We also need to enhance the UI to support adding/deleting additional RuleAnnotations.
> Accordingly to the spec has no evaluation semantic. User can put in any value. is only text like "code comments".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month