[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2657) [DMN Designer] Select Box for Decision Table input columns
by Jozef Marko (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Jozef Marko closed DROOLS-2657.
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 7.36.0.Final
Resolution: Won't Do
No input for ~2 years. Reported internally. If customer requires can report with proper description/versions.
> [DMN Designer] Select Box for Decision Table input columns
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2657
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-2657
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.8.0.Final
> Reporter: Jozef Marko
> Assignee: Guilherme Gomes
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: drools-tools
> Fix For: 7.36.0.Final
>
>
> Currently the decision table input columns can be named with any name. However their names should correspond to InputData elements in the DRG, thus we should provide select box for each decision table input column, where user would select corresponding InputData element for the given decision table input column.
> h3. Acceptance test
> # Sorting in select box
> # Rename InputData, change reflected in select box
> # Same InputData connected to multiple nodes, appropriate select boxes contain the value
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3317) Guided Decision Tables: Insert in RHS not creating valid code for boolean fields.
by Jozef Marko (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-3317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Jozef Marko closed DROOLS-3317.
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 7.36.0.Final
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Tried to construct rule with setting boolean on right site. No validation/build error thrown.
> Guided Decision Tables: Insert in RHS not creating valid code for boolean fields.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3317
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-3317
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Guided Decision Table Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.15.0.Final
> Reporter: Toni Rikkola
> Assignee: Guilherme Gomes
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
> Fix For: 7.36.0.Final
>
>
> Insert a fact with a boolean field in dtable RHS.
> The DRL generated looks like this:
> {code:java}
> rule "Row 3 The Table"
> dialect "mvel"
> when
> s : Source( age >= 18 , kitten == "Dog" )
> then
> s.setRisk( "ok" );
> DroolsUtil fact0 = new DroolsUtil();
> fact0.setARuleFired( true );
> insert( fact0 );
> end
> {code}
> The line
> {code:java}
> fact0.setARuleFired( true );
> {code}
> does not compile. It should be ( for example ):
> {code:java}
> fact0.aRuleFired = true;
> {code}
> The above is done by inserting the fact with BRL action, but the same error bothers the "Set the value of field" option.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2464) Getting OutOfMemory Error
by Bhavesh Kharwa (Jira)
Bhavesh Kharwa created JGRP-2464:
------------------------------------
Summary: Getting OutOfMemory Error
Key: JGRP-2464
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JGRP-2464
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.6.13
Reporter: Bhavesh Kharwa
Assignee: Bela Ban
Attachments: oom-jgroup.jpg
I am using artemis version 2.11.0 and run artemis in master slave. There are two master and each master having slave. Please find attached screenshot of OutOfMemory error.
I have tried to reproduce this issue but not able to reproduce it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2403) Dump information in panic scenarios
by Bela Ban (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JGRP-2403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Bela Ban updated JGRP-2403:
---------------------------
Description:
When there is a panic situation (e.g. thread pool exhausted), dump information (e.g. including a thread dump) to a file at FATAL level.
The question is *when* do we do this? If the pool fluctuates between almost-full and full, we can't obviously take a thread dump every time!
was:
When there is a panic situation (e.g. thread pool exhausted), dump information (e.g. including a thread dump) to a file at FATAL level.
> Dump information in panic scenarios
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2403
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JGRP-2403
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.2.2, 5.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> When there is a panic situation (e.g. thread pool exhausted), dump information (e.g. including a thread dump) to a file at FATAL level.
> The question is *when* do we do this? If the pool fluctuates between almost-full and full, we can't obviously take a thread dump every time!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5220) Make @watch annotation to also work with oopath
by Mario Fusco (Jira)
Mario Fusco created DROOLS-5220:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Make @watch annotation to also work with oopath
Key: DROOLS-5220
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5220
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Mario Fusco
Assignee: Mario Fusco
Property reactivity is currently working on oopath as demostrated by this test case:
{code}
@Test
public void testPropertyReactivityWithOOPath() {
String str =
"import " + Person.class.getCanonicalName() + ";" +
"import " + AdultUnit.class.getCanonicalName() + "\n" +
"rule Adult @Unit( AdultUnit.class ) when\n" +
" $p : /persons[name == \"Mario\"]\n" +
"then\n" +
" modify($p) { setAge($p.getAge()+1) };\n" +
"end\n";
KieContainer kieContainer = getKieContainer( null, str );
RuleUnitExecutor executor = RuleUnitExecutor.newRuleUnitExecutor( kieContainer );
Person mario = new Person( "Mario", 45 );
Person sofia = new Person( "Sofia", 8 );
DataSource<Person> persons = DataSource.create( mario, sofia );
AdultUnit unit = new AdultUnit(persons);
assertEquals(1, executor.run( unit ) );
assertEquals(46, mario.getAge() );
}
{code}
Conversely what it is not working (it doesn't compile at all) is the use of the @watch annotation like in
{code}
@Test
public void testPropertyReactivityWithOOPathAndWatch() {
String str =
"import " + Person.class.getCanonicalName() + ";" +
"import " + AdultUnit.class.getCanonicalName() + "\n" +
"rule Adult @Unit( AdultUnit.class ) when\n" +
" $p : /persons[$age : age, name == \"Mario\"] @watch( !age )\n" +
"then\n" +
" modify($p) { setAge($age+1) };\n" +
"end\n";
KieContainer kieContainer = getKieContainer( null, str );
RuleUnitExecutor executor = RuleUnitExecutor.newRuleUnitExecutor( kieContainer );
Person mario = new Person( "Mario", 45 );
Person sofia = new Person( "Sofia", 8 );
DataSource<Person> persons = DataSource.create( mario, sofia );
AdultUnit unit = new AdultUnit(persons);
assertEquals(1, executor.run( unit ) );
assertEquals(46, mario.getAge() );
}
{code}
Of course this can work only on a one-level oopath. It has to be decided what to do (trigger a compile time error?) when trying to use that annotation on a oopath made of 2 or more chunks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1107) Update prepare-e2e-tests-env.sh and prepare-ui-tests-env.sh to be less verbose
by Filip Brychta (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Filip Brychta resolved SWSQE-1107.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Done
> Update prepare-e2e-tests-env.sh and prepare-ui-tests-env.sh to be less verbose
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-1107
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1107
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: QE Task
> Reporter: Filip Brychta
> Assignee: Filip Brychta
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: infrastructure
>
> It produces very long output containing lot of:
> Cloning into '/home/jenkins/agent/workspace/run-kiali-e2e-tests/kiali'...
> Checking out files: 42% (3633/8645)
> Checking out files: 43% (3718/8645)
> Checking out files: 44% (3804/8645)
> Checking out files: 45% (3891/8645)
> Checking out files: 46% (3977/8645)
> Checking out files: 47% (4064/8645)
> Checking out files: 48% (4150/8645)
> From https://github.com/kiali/kiali
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1/head -> origin/pr/1/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1/merge -> origin/pr/1/merge
> * [new ref] refs/pull/10/head -> origin/pr/10/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/10/merge -> origin/pr/10/merge
> * [new ref] refs/pull/100/head -> origin/pr/100/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1000/head -> origin/pr/1000/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1001/head -> origin/pr/1001/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1002/head -> origin/pr/1002/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1003/head -> origin/pr/1003/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1004/head -> origin/pr/1004/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1005/head -> origin/pr/1005/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1009/head -> origin/pr/1009/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/101/head -> origin/pr/101/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1010/head -> origin/pr/1010/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1011/head -> origin/pr/1011/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1012/head -> origin/pr/1012/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1013/head -> origin/pr/1013/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1014/head -> origin/pr/1014/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1015/head -> origin/pr/1015/head
> * [new ref] refs/pull/1016/head -> origin/pr/1016/head
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 3 months