April 2020 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1110) E2E job - Swagger Version Always 'master'

by Filip Brychta (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Filip Brychta reassigned SWSQE-1110: ------------------------------------ Assignee: Filip Brychta > E2E job - Swagger Version Always 'master' > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: SWSQE-1110 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1110 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Matthew Mahoney > Assignee: Filip Brychta > Priority: Major > Labels: infrastructure > > Issue is that the swagger json is always 'master'. > prepare-e2e-tests-env.sh needs to set the swagger file version/path appropriately based on KIALI_REVISION_SHA1 > https://github.com/kiali/kiali/blob/master/tests/e2e/config/env.yaml#L10 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5212) Latest Drools-compiler version has dependency of xstream-1.4.11.1.jar which causing HIGH vulnerability CVE-2013-7285

by Mario Fusco (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Mario Fusco resolved DROOLS-5212. --------------------------------- Resolution: Explained > Latest Drools-compiler version has dependency of xstream-1.4.11.1.jar which causing HIGH vulnerability CVE-2013-7285 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5212 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5212 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Priti Rane > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Priority: Major > > All drools compiler versions after 7.21.0.Final are using xstream version 1.14.11.1. We are using anchore engine for vulnerability scan and it is giving HIGH vulnerability CVE-2013-7285 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7285. There is a workaround to implement the security framework. However we are using kie-ci jar which has the drools-compiler dependency. So to resolve this , we have to implement the workaround in drools-compiler source code and build the jar and use it. But this solution is not maintainable. > Is there any plans to implement the security framework in next version of drools-compiler ? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1110) E2E job - Swagger Version Always 'master'

by Matthew Mahoney (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Matthew Mahoney updated SWSQE-1110: ----------------------------------- Summary: E2E job - Swagger Version Always 'master' (was: Swagger Version Needs To Be That Of ) > E2E job - Swagger Version Always 'master' > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: SWSQE-1110 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1110 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Matthew Mahoney > Priority: Major > Labels: infrastructure > > Issue is that the swagger json is always 'master'. > prepare-e2e-tests-env.sh needs to set the swagger file version/path appropriately based on KIALI_REVISION_SHA1 > https://github.com/kiali/kiali/blob/master/tests/e2e/config/env.yaml#L10 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5216) Rule compilation error when binding fields indexed with square brackets

by Mario Fusco (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Mario Fusco updated DROOLS-5216: -------------------------------- Sprint: 2020 Week 13-15 (from Mar 23) > Rule compilation error when binding fields indexed with square brackets > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5216 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5216 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core engine > Affects Versions: 7.35.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Casalino > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Priority: Major > Attachments: binding-field-indexed-with-square-brackets.zip > > > Executable model rule compilation fails on patters that bind a collection field indexed with square brackets > Example of DRL that fails to compile: > {noformat} > rule "binding field indexed with square brackets" > when Pojo($firstItem : integerList[0]) > Pojo(integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem) > then > end > {noformat} > Error: > {noformat} > Message [id=1, level=ERROR, path=src/main/java/org/drools/reproducer/RulesE96881902F91EBF30C7D6404720A1A94RuleMethods0.java, line=29, column=138 > text=no suitable method found for bind(org.drools.model.Variable<java.util.Map>,(org.drool[...]et(0)) > method org.drools.model.PatternDSL.PatternDef.<A>bind(org.drools.model.Variable<A>,org.drools.model.functions.Function1<org.drools.reproducer.Pojo,A>) is not applicable > (inference variable A has incompatible bounds > equality constraints: java.util.Map > lower bounds: java.lang.Integer) > method org.drools.model.PatternDSL.PatternDef.<A>bind(org.drools.model.Variable<A>,org.drools.model.functions.Function1<org.drools.reproducer.Pojo,A>,org.drools.model.PatternDSL.ReactOn) is not applicable > (cannot infer type-variable(s) A > (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)) > method org.drools.model.PatternDSL.PatternDef.<A,U>bind(org.drools.model.Variable<A>,org.drools.model.Variable<U>,org.drools.model.functions.Function1<U,A>) is not applicable > (cannot infer type-variable(s) A,U > (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)) > {noformat} > The example works fine when compiling without executable model. > Furthermore, the same example expressed with OOPath fails to compile *both with and without executable model*: > {noformat} > rule "binding field indexed with square brackets in OOPath" > when Pojo($firstItem : /integerList[0]) > Pojo(/integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem) > then > end > {noformat} > Error without executable model: > {noformat} > Message [id=1, kieBase=binding-field-indexed-with-square-brackets, level=ERROR, path=org/drools/reproducer/rules.drl, line=4, column=0 > text=Unable to Analyse Expression /integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem: > [Error: Missing left node] > [Near : {... /integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem ....}] > {noformat} > Error with executable model: > {noformat} > Message [id=1, kieBase=binding-field-indexed-with-square-brackets, level=ERROR, path=org/drools/reproducer/rules.drl, line=-1, column=0 > text=Unknown field integerList on class java.lang.Integer] > {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5214) Executable model compilation fails with constraints containing static method calls

by Mario Fusco (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Mario Fusco resolved DROOLS-5214. --------------------------------- Resolution: Done Fixed by https://github.com/kiegroup/drools/commit/37642f78b662288d28707e56b163220... > Executable model compilation fails with constraints containing static method calls > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5214 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5214 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core engine > Affects Versions: 7.35.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Casalino > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Priority: Major > Attachments: static-methods-in-contraint.zip > > > Executable model rule compilation fails on patterns containing Java static method calls as constraints > Example of DRL that fails to compile: > {noformat} > rule "Array asList" > when Pojo(java.util.Arrays.asList(1,5,2,3).containsAll(integerList)) > then > end > {noformat} > or > {noformat} > rule "collections disjoint" > when $p : Pojo($boundList : integerList) Pojo(id > $p.id, !java.util.Collections.disjoint( integerList , $boundList )) > then > end > {noformat} > or > {noformat} > rule "containsAll" > when Pojo(integerList.containsAll(java.util.Arrays.asList(1,3)), integerList.size() == 2) > then > end > {noformat} > All above examples work fine when compiling without executable model. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1110) Swagger Version Needs To Be That Of

by Matthew Mahoney (Jira)

Matthew Mahoney created SWSQE-1110: -------------------------------------- Summary: Swagger Version Needs To Be That Of Key: SWSQE-1110 URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1110 Project: Kiali QE Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Matthew Mahoney Issue is that the swagger json is always 'master'. prepare-e2e-tests-env.sh needs to set the swagger file version/path appropriately based on KIALI_REVISION_SHA1 https://github.com/kiali/kiali/blob/master/tests/e2e/config/env.yaml#L10 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5216) Rule compilation error when binding fields indexed with square brackets

by Matteo Casalino (Jira)

Matteo Casalino created DROOLS-5216: --------------------------------------- Summary: Rule compilation error when binding fields indexed with square brackets Key: DROOLS-5216 URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5216 Project: Drools Issue Type: Bug Components: core engine Affects Versions: 7.35.0.Final Reporter: Matteo Casalino Assignee: Mario Fusco Attachments: binding-field-indexed-with-square-brackets.zip Executable model rule compilation fails on patters that bind a collection field indexed with square brackets Example of DRL that fails to compile: {noformat} rule "binding field indexed with square brackets" when Pojo($firstItem : integerList[0]) Pojo(integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem) then end {noformat} Error: {noformat} Message [id=1, level=ERROR, path=src/main/java/org/drools/reproducer/RulesE96881902F91EBF30C7D6404720A1A94RuleMethods0.java, line=29, column=138 text=no suitable method found for bind(org.drools.model.Variable<java.util.Map>,(org.drool[...]et(0)) method org.drools.model.PatternDSL.PatternDef.<A>bind(org.drools.model.Variable<A>,org.drools.model.functions.Function1<org.drools.reproducer.Pojo,A>) is not applicable (inference variable A has incompatible bounds equality constraints: java.util.Map lower bounds: java.lang.Integer) method org.drools.model.PatternDSL.PatternDef.<A>bind(org.drools.model.Variable<A>,org.drools.model.functions.Function1<org.drools.reproducer.Pojo,A>,org.drools.model.PatternDSL.ReactOn) is not applicable (cannot infer type-variable(s) A (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)) method org.drools.model.PatternDSL.PatternDef.<A,U>bind(org.drools.model.Variable<A>,org.drools.model.Variable<U>,org.drools.model.functions.Function1<U,A>) is not applicable (cannot infer type-variable(s) A,U (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)) {noformat} The example works fine when compiling without executable model. Furthermore, the same example expressed with OOPath fails to compile *both with and without executable model*: {noformat} rule "binding field indexed with square brackets in OOPath" when Pojo($firstItem : /integerList[0]) Pojo(/integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem) then end {noformat} Error without executable model: {noformat} Message [id=1, kieBase=binding-field-indexed-with-square-brackets, level=ERROR, path=org/drools/reproducer/rules.drl, line=4, column=0 text=Unable to Analyse Expression /integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem: [Error: Missing left node] [Near : {... /integerList[this.integerList.size()-1] == $firstItem ....}] {noformat} Error with executable model: {noformat} Message [id=1, kieBase=binding-field-indexed-with-square-brackets, level=ERROR, path=org/drools/reproducer/rules.drl, line=-1, column=0 text=Unknown field integerList on class java.lang.Integer] {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1109) Fix code coverage and make it work for upstream istio pipeline too

by Filip Brychta (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Filip Brychta updated SWSQE-1109: --------------------------------- Description: Required parameters are not passed to kiali pod for some reason. Also it should be possible to run code coverage in upstream istio pipeline was:Required parameters are not passed to kiali pod for some reason. > Fix code coverage and make it work for upstream istio pipeline too > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SWSQE-1109 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1109 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: QE Task > Reporter: Filip Brychta > Assignee: Filip Brychta > Priority: Major > Labels: infrastructure > > Required parameters are not passed to kiali pod for some reason. > Also it should be possible to run code coverage in upstream istio pipeline -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1109) Fix code coverage and make it work for upstream istio pipeline too

by Filip Brychta (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Filip Brychta updated SWSQE-1109: --------------------------------- Summary: Fix code coverage and make it work for upstream istio pipeline too (was: Fix code coverage) > Fix code coverage and make it work for upstream istio pipeline too > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SWSQE-1109 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1109 > Project: Kiali QE > Issue Type: QE Task > Reporter: Filip Brychta > Assignee: Filip Brychta > Priority: Major > Labels: infrastructure > > Required parameters are not passed to kiali pod for some reason. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5214) Executable model compilation fails with constraints containing static method calls

by Mario Fusco (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Mario Fusco commented on DROOLS-5214: ------------------------------------- I reproduced the problem thanks a lot. As a side note I noticed that it happens only if you use the fully qualified name of the class on which you're calling the static method. As a temporary workaround (if necessary) you could import java.util.Arrays and use the simple name in the method invocation like in {code} import java.util.Arrays; rule "Array asList" when Pojo(Arrays.asList(1,5,2,3).containsAll(integerList)) then end {code} > Executable model compilation fails with constraints containing static method calls > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5214 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5214 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core engine > Affects Versions: 7.35.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Casalino > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Priority: Major > Attachments: static-methods-in-contraint.zip > > > Executable model rule compilation fails on patterns containing Java static method calls as constraints > Example of DRL that fails to compile: > {noformat} > rule "Array asList" > when Pojo(java.util.Arrays.asList(1,5,2,3).containsAll(integerList)) > then > end > {noformat} > or > {noformat} > rule "collections disjoint" > when $p : Pojo($boundList : integerList) Pojo(id > $p.id, !java.util.Collections.disjoint( integerList , $boundList )) > then > end > {noformat} > or > {noformat} > rule "containsAll" > when Pojo(integerList.containsAll(java.util.Arrays.asList(1,3)), integerList.size() == 2) > then > end > {noformat} > All above examples work fine when compiling without executable model. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

4 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira April 2020