[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Ondrej Kotek commented on WFLY-7578:
------------------------------------
There are two inconsistencies. One in the XSD, and the second one in management model:
* To support comprehensibility of XSD, {{basicFileType}} and {{fileType}} complex types
should be used, (x)or {{path}} and {{relative-to}} attributes should be used, but not
both.
* To support comprehensibility of DMR, files should be represented as objects, (x)or
files should be represented as attributes, but not both.
Should I create separate JIRA issues?
Inconsistencies in using fileType/path+relative-to in Elytron
XSD/DMR
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-7578
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7578
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Security
Affects Versions: 11.0.0.Alpha1
Reporter: Ondrej Kotek
Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
Labels: user_experience
*Issue description:*
In _wildfly-elytron_1_0.xsd_, a file type is represented inconsistently. There are
{{basicFileType}} and {{fileType}} complex types used, but there are also {{path}} and
{{relative-to}} attributes used ({{providerLoadersType}}, {{kerberosSecurityFactory}}).
In DMR, file is represented as object (e.g. {{properties-realm}}) or as attributes (e.g.
{{filesystem-realm}}, {{key-store}}).
*Suggestions for improvement:*
The file representation should be consistent in XSD/DMR.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)