[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1315?page=comments#action_1241... ]
Anil Saldhana commented on EJBTHREE-1315:
-----------------------------------------
Yes, I did that too. Naming the id to client would give us the jar name we want. There
was an issue with ejb3/plugin/src..../installer.xml or somewhere else where u need to
specify the id of the all the client jars for assembly. finalName was useless too.
As I said, we need more options on the assembly plugin to get a final mapped name that is
exactly the one specified in the options.
Make EJB3 Client Assembly its own Project
-----------------------------------------
Key: EJBTHREE-1315
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1315
Project: EJB 3.0
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Andrew Lee Rubinger
Assigned To: Andrew Lee Rubinger
Priority: Critical
Fix For: AS 5.0.0.CR1
The EJB3 Client JAR should be assembled by its own project because:
* It may incorporate classes from any of the EJB3 Projects, not just Core
* Renaming to finalName "jboss-ejb3-client" is not possible from within Core as
the artifact must both be attached to the build and the "finalName" property
does not change the artifactId (as we're currently using a classifier). This leads
to:
org.apache.maven.artifact.InvalidArtifactRTException: For artifact
{org.jboss.ejb3:jboss-ejb3-core:0.1.0-SNAPSHOT:jar}: An attached artifact must have a
different ID than its corresponding main artifact.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira