Incorrect V&V results when operator is filled in the row (as opposed to column definition) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: DROOLS-3283 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3283 Project: Drools Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 7.14.0.Final Reporter: Toni Rikkola Assignee: Toni Rikkola Priority: Major Labels: drools-tools, support Imagine data model Person with attribute age. If you create decision table and add two columns: - both are defined against "age" attribute - none of them have operator defined then you add one row, and you fill in the operator and the value directly inside the row. For example: >= 20 <= 30 The generated DRL looks like this: {code:java} package org; //from row number: 1 rule "Row 1 AnotherTest" dialect "mvel" when p : Person( age >= 20 , age <= 30 ) then p.setAgeGroup( "whatever" ); end {code} The V&V will report this as conflicting row: !6iOx.png|thumbnail!