[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Ondrej Zizka commented on WFLY-2426:
------------------------------------
I don't like the solution with file buried somewhere in the dir structure which is not
even guaranteed to remain as is for future releases.
I've created the two PR's - 5551 and 5552, two impls of the same - adding
version-base.txt.
Currently it uses ${project.version}. Is maitaining the version string manually necessary?
IMO we should rely on the version from POM.
The name is version-base.properties.
1) it clearly declares the file format,
2) it declares that it's for the "base" layer.
Ad 2) - for other layers, another file would be added. This ensures that tools only
looking for AS will find it, and it's version. Tools looking for all layers may simply
check for version-*.properties, just like they would check for
"modules/system/layers/" + layer + ...
Easily accessible static information describing the release
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-2426
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2426
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Server
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Ondrej Zizka
Tools that work with a WF installation need to identify what they are working with before
they can launch or interact with the server. Specifically, they need to know the version.
They likely need to know other information as well, such as the name of the software; e.g.
whether it is WildFly itself or some other project based on WildFly.
This information should be provided in standard format in a text file in a standard
location in the distribution (probably in bin). The text file should be generated as part
of the build.
The solution to this issue should consider the requirements of other
"identities" that may be based on WildFly. See [1] for the definition of an
identity.
The solution to this issue should consider the needs of products based on WildFly and
other non-product identities. For example, can the existing product.conf contain the
necessary information for a product, with some differently named but largely equivalent
file being used in a non-product distribution?
The solution to this issue should consider the implications for the patching tool.
[1]
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/LayeredDistributionsAndModulePathOrganiz... for
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira