[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Radim Vansa commented on JGRP-2172:
-----------------------------------
[~belaban] Yes, I think so. It's a bit tempting to exclude OOB messages from this
rule, however I am afraid that this could lead to long message starvation: imagine that
one long and many short messages are sent: it he big one does not have enough credits, it
will wait. If the replenishment is not big enough to allow this long one to be sent as
well, it will stay there - the short messages could cut their small portion of credits,
though, but when another replenishement comes, since the credit count has dropped, there
still won't be enough credits...
Non-blocking flow control
-------------------------
Key: JGRP-2172
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2172
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 4.0.4
Sending a message through FlowControl (UFC, MFC) should not block if
{{Message.Flag.NB_FC}} (non-blocking flow control) is set.
Instead, the message should be added to a queue (bounded if {{max_size}} > 0, else
unbounded). The max queue size is given in bytes, so we can estimate what the memory
penalty for reaching that size would be (if bounded).
The queued messages are sent when credits arrive. TBD: when credits arrive, should
blocked threads or queued messages be released first?
Non-blocking flow control can be used by both external and internal threads.
If the queue is unbounded, then it is the responsibility of the application (e.g.
Infinispan) to make sure the queue doesn't grow to an untenable size.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)