[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1675:
--------------------------------
Can you reproduce this ? It would be interesting to see what the active pool/queue sizes
are, e.g. with {{probe.sh jmx=UDP.oob,reg,int}}.
You can also look at the credits of all members with {{probe.sh op=UFC.printCredits}}.
OK, this is a unicast message, or else it would not be stuck in {{UFC}}. We now need to
see which peer it is that's not processing this node's messages. Method
{{printCredits()}} should list credits for each receiver, and the one that's 0 is the
one you need to look at.
Note that you can also connect via jconsole to get the above data.
I suspect that the peer's thread pool is maxed out, but do confirm this.
Threads stuck in FlowControl.decrementIfEnoughCredits
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1675
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1675
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.4
Reporter: Radim Vansa
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 3.5
Attachments: jgroups-udp-radim.xml, RemoteGetStressTest.java, UPerf2.java
I have recently observed a repeated situation where many (or all) threads have been stuck
waiting for credits in FlowControl protocol.
The credit request was not handled on the other node as this is non-oob message and some
(actually many of them - cause unknown) messages before the request have been lost -
therefore the request was waiting for them to be re-sent.
However, these have not been re-sent properly as the retransmission request was not
received - all OOB threads were stuck in the FlowControl protocol as these handled some
other request and tried to send a response - but the response could not be sent until
FlowControl gets the credits.
The probability of such situation could be lowered by tagging the credit request to be
OOB - then it would be handled immediately. If the credit replenish message would then be
processed in regular OOB pool, this could get already depleted by many requests, but
setting up the internal thread pool would solve the problem.
Other consideration would be to allow releasing thread from FlowControl (let it send the
message even without credits) if it waits there for too long.
h3. Workaround
It appears that setting MFC and UFC max_credits to 10M or removing these protocols at all
is a workaround for this issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)