[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Stetson Robinson commented on DROOLS-3482: ------------------------------------------ [~tirelli], [~uxdlc], I see. Would we cover our bases better if we said *Included DMN artifacts* or *Included artifacts*? * Tab and page header: *Included DMN artifacts* / *Included artifacts* * Description: *Included DMN artifacts are externally defined DMN models or other DMN-related artifacts that have been added to this DMN file so that its decision requirements diagram or graph components are available to this DMN file.* Still not in love with the description wording, but would that general idea work? Would *assets* be better than *artifacts*? I hesitate to say "assets" because that's what we use in the general project import screen. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)