[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry commented on WFCORE-4207: ------------------------------------------ We need to be careful that this is the right thing to do. The problem is these are not used as single resource definitions, as they originally were in the threads subsystem. They are just reusable code. So, if subsystem X uses this code and creates an executor of some type named "default" it's not wrong for subsystem Y to also create the same kind of pool with the same name. But if they end up with the same capability name, that will no longer work. Now, it's possible that this was already a problem, as this kind of thing would have led to a duplicate ServiceName problem. In which case we don't need to worry about it so much. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)