[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Stetson Robinson commented on DROOLS-2706: ------------------------------------------ [~ibek], what other assets besides rules will the scenario test then? Regarding the name, I think the word "Test" needs to be there because users know what a "test" is intuitively, but "simulation" takes some thought and interpretation. A "simulation" and a "test" mean close to the same thing in this context, so we should opt for the clearer term, which imo is "test". And we should not say "simulation test" or "test simulator", which are redundant. As I understand it, this feature is a way to test that a scenario of conditions yields the expected results based on the rules user's have created. So because of that, *Rule Scenario Test* or just *Scenario Test* or frankly the existing name *Test Scenario* makes the most sense to me. Is there any reason why we don't just leave this feature called *Test Scenario* as it is? Why do we need to change the name and why does everyone keep suggesting "simulation" as part of it? I assume I must be overlooking some aspect of this feature. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)