[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Scott Marlow commented on JBJCA-1357:
-------------------------------------
If JCA used Transaction.registerSynch, then at beforeCompletion time, JCA would delist
XAResource's from the JTA transaction, before JPA has written to the database, since
Transaction.registerSynch registered synchronizations are run first (at beforeCompletion
time).
The other reason for JCA to use interposed synchronizations, is separation of system level
components from application level components, as mentioned in
[
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/transaction/TransactionSynchro...].
TransactionSynchronizer registered as interposed synchronization
leads to ordering issue when using hibernate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBJCA-1357
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1357
Project: IronJacamar
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.4.5
Reporter: Alexander Pinske
Attachments: jca-hibernate.zip
The TransactionSynchronizer (to cleanup connections) is registered as an interposed
synchronization. Hibernate also registers its synchronization (to close the underlying
JDBC connection handle) as interposed.
This leads to undefined ordering, which in my case runs the JCA Synch before the
Hibernate Synch. This leads to a log of IJ000316 and the connection being killed.
I think that platform specific cleanup should be executed after all application level
synchronization have run, therefore it should be registered with the TM (not the TSR).
http://www.ironjacamar.org/doc/roadto12/txtracking.html describes this as an application
misbehaviour. But I don't think the application has any means of controlling the
ordering in this scenario.
If I do not provide a TSR to the TransactionIntegrationImpl (which would lead to the
registration of the TransactionSynchronizer via TransactionManager - thus non-interposed)
has the problem that AbstractPool uses the TSR to check if a transaction is actually in
progress.
I don't know if my rationale is correct. Could you please comment on the issue?
Thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)