[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBLOGGING-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
Murmur Murmur edited comment on JBLOGGING-118 at 10/5/15 7:29 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't have a luxury of installing new jars server-side. All war files should be self
contained applications. Some apps use a standard JDK provided logging capability, want to
minimize all extra libraries or both valid reasons. This is currently a no-go if app is
using say OpenJPA+JerseyRest+validator@annotations, jboss-logging is not behaving nice
with any of that combination.
Is there an internal valid reasons to have a subclass of Level even if it's known to
create memory problems? If yes I understand this and won't push this change anymore. I
use my own version of library and state in Stackoverflow and rest forums it is just an
unofficial fix, don't expect it to pull regular upstream changes.
Another globally side-effect safe working solution, very easy to implement would be to
have JDKLoggerProvider2.java+JDKLogger2.java implementation. It did not use JDKLevel.java
class at all. No fragmented jboss-logging libraries in wild.
was (Author: murmur001):
I don't have a luxury of installing new jars server-side. All war files should be self
contained applications. Some apps use a standard JDK provided logging capability, want to
minimize all extra libraries or both valid reasons. This is currently a no-go if app is
using say OpenJPA+JerseyRest+validator@annotations, jboss-logging is not behaving nice
with any of that combination.
Is there an internal valid reasons to have a subclass of Level even if it's known to
create memory problems? If yes I understand this and and won't push this change
anymore. I use my own version of library and state in Stackoverflow and rest forums it is
just an unofficial fix, don't expect it to pull regular upstream changes.
Another globally side-effect safe working solution, very easy to implement would be to
have JDKLoggerProvider2.java+JDKLogger2.java implementation. It did not use JDKLevel.java
class at all. No fragmented jboss-logging libraries in wild.
Subclass of java.util.logging.Level creates PermGen memory leak
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBLOGGING-118
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBLOGGING-118
Project: JBoss Logging
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jboss-logging-jdk
Affects Versions: 3.3.0.Beta1
Environment: JDK7, Tomcat 7, OpenJPA-2.4.1, ValidationAPI-1.x,
hibernate-validator-5.2.1, jboss-logging (fresh from github).
Reporter: Murmur Murmur
Assignee: James Perkins
Subclass of java.util.logging.Level creates PermGen memory leak if webapp provides
jboss-logging.jar inside a webapp. This happen most likely in Tomcat and hot-redeployment
stops working after few times out of PermGen memory.
It's a commonly known side effect of JDK logging library, projects should not inherit
Level class.
See this discussion and github pull request where I have fixed this problem.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/32412984/185565
https://github.com/jboss-logging/jboss-logging/pull/21
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)