[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1549:
--------------------------------
I changed the code according to the above proposal, and added byteman based tests (see
TCPConnectionMapTest) to enforce concurrent connections.
The test suite passes, but I want to do more testing before I merge my change to master.
This code will only live in 3.3, as there were quite a few changes, and I don't want
to de-stabilize 3.2.x. After all, the existing code isn't incorrect, just
inefficient.
TCP: handle concurrent connections more gracefully
--------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1549
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1549
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Enhancement
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 3.3
Attachments: cft.log.gz
When A connects to B and B connects to A *concurrently*, and no existing connections are
present, then one member (with the higher address) will prevail, and the other one will
close its connection and drop the message.
This is not usually an issue, as higher-up layers will retransmit the message, thus
re-establishing the connection.
However, if we have a protocol based on negative acks, such as UNICAST2, the
retransmission might take a while if that message was the last one.
SOLUTION:
The end that closes the connection should simply resend the message *once*, thus
re-creating the connection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira