Mario Fusco created DROOLS-3499: ----------------------------------- Summary: Allow both prefixed and infixed AND in nested accumulates Key: DROOLS-3499 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3499 Project: Drools Issue Type: Feature Request Components: core engine Reporter: Mario Fusco Assignee: Mario Fusco At the moment drools can compile composite condition in a nested accumulate only using a prefixed 'and' like in {code} String($l: length) accumulate( (and Integer(this == $l) accumulate( Long() ;$counter: count(1);$counter <= 4) ) ;$mainCounter: count(1);$mCounter <= 2 ) {code} while it fails when using the infixed notation like in: {code} String($l: length) accumulate( ( Integer(this == $l) and accumulate( Long() ;$counter: count(1);$counter <= 4) ) ;$mainCounter: count(1);$mCounter <= 2 ) {code} It is required that this could work also with the infix AND also because this is notation used by the DRLDumper when regenerating the drl from a PackageDescr -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)