]
Nuno Godinho de Matos commented on WFCORE-3210:
-----------------------------------------------
Hi David,
Many thanks for your question.
No I did not know.
My impression was that if I were to deploy an individual application with log4jproperties
file, wildfly would understand this and configure that application to be Logging with
log4j.
Therefore a per deployment support of log4j.
The disadvantage there would be:
You lose the ability of supporting a single log file to keep track of category log levels
for all of the deployments
Each application will have to log to its own log files.
You miss out on important background log messages that are not directly related to your
deployed application.
To name but a few of the reasons why the per deployment logging configuration is not of
interest to us, and the logging configuration like done logging subsytem level is much
more I retesting for us.
Are you then saying that it is possible to have something like the subsystem logging
configuration but instead of using jul based appenders to simply use log4j?
Can you point me onto the documentation for this?
Many many thanks.
Wildfly module isolation not working consistently
-------------------------------------------------
Key: WFCORE-3210
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3210
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Logging, Modules
Affects Versions: 2.2.0.Final
Reporter: Nuno Godinho de Matos
There is an underministic bug on the module layer of wildfly, whereby the boot logic of
the application server is not ensured to give the appropriate module isolation - which can
lead to unexpected boot classpath problems.
An example of this phenomena is given on the wildfly forum thread:
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/275839
In this example, we have the logging subsystem setup to use a custome handler.
The custom handler wishes to have acces to the JUL extension classes on the
org.jboss.logmanger module, but wishes to do have no relationship with the
org.apache.log4j packages associated to the wildfly org.jboss.log4j module.
What we see in this example is that an application gets from wildfly mixed behavior.
Most of the time, during boot, the processes works without problem, where the custom
handler runs isolated from the undersired log4j libraries within wildfly.
But other times the application boot procedure will not go smoothly with the custom
handler having processes routing JUL LogRecords events into the bundled log4j because the
application server has loaded some of the classes that exist the org.jboss.log4j module.
And as we know when the same class is loaded by different class loaders, then that class
that orinates from class loader A cannot be assigned to the corresponding class of class
loader B, even if the classes are exactly the same.
This is not an isolated issue.
There are also open issues on the wildfly forum reporting on startup problems on the
logging subsystme where sometimes the LogManager class had not yet been loaded, and
sometimes this issue goes away.
This is an indication of some deep issue engrained into the module loading, where the
module isolation behavior is not ensured to work all the time and that the boot procedure
is not deterministically reliable.
It should not be that the application server some time starts successfully and others
not.
Booting wildfly should always result in the same outcode.
Problems of this nature with class loading problems should either always happen if the
configuration is not done properly or never happen if the configuration is proper.
In the case of thread:
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/275839
Our belief is that the configuration is doing all it possible can to request the
necessary module isolation from base packages and the outcome where log4j class load
problems take place should never be allowed to happen.
Many thanks.