[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Jean Francois Denise commented on WFLY-12299:
---------------------------------------------
The current xxx-server is not very well formalized. It is a mix of WildFly server and
"feature server" (such as web-server or core-server).
We have base-server (root resource and default public interface), core-server (an
aggregation of the main features core-feature pack is expected to offer), web-server (a
servlet container).
The server aspect of "base-server" meant that a WildFly server would be able to
start when provisioning this layer. There is no "server" aspect, no entry point
open for interaction.
The server aspect of "core-server" meant that a WildFly server offering the
expected "management" feature would be provisioned. It could have been named
"management-support" or "core-support". There is a "server"
aspect, the management interface. This entry-point is not bound to the
"core-server", it is the "management" layer that brings it, so
provisioning "management" with any other layer would bring a "management
server".
The server aspect of "web-server" meant both an aggregation of all features
expected by a servlet container (ee, naming, deployment scanner) and the servlet server.
The jaxrs-server vs jaxrs is to be consistent with other decorators, but if jaxrs is not
usable at all without a servlet container, it is implicit that the webserver is needed.
The scanner can be explicitly excluded from the web-server, it is an optional dependency.
Questions on the servers you listed. Having the "xxx-server" layer seems to help
separate use-cases when defining new layers.
"ejb-server"
Do you see splitting the ejb features into multiple layers, eg: ejb-common (dependency for
other layers, eg: timers), ejb-session, ejb-mdb? We could still imagine a
web-server+ejb-session kind of provisioned server.
The ejb-server would depend on ejb-session, configure a remote-connector, enable
remote-naming, depend on undertow (no servlet support) + optionally iiop layer.
"mdb-server"
Do you see it as something like the ejb-mdb + jms-activemq + resource-adapters layer?
"batch-server"
From what I read, batch needs to be explicitly called. What would be
the entry-point? Could be a servlet, jsf, ... So shouldn't it be a "batch"
layer provisioned with another server that has the entry-point? eg: jsf+batch
More fine grain dependency for galleon basic layers
---------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-12299
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12299
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Build System
Reporter: Jean Francois Denise
Assignee: Jean Francois Denise
Priority: Major
Having basic layers to only depend on the layers (and features) they do require will
offer more flexibility than depending on web-server layer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)