[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Jiri Locker commented on DROOLS-1326:
-------------------------------------
Hi Matteo, that's a valid question.
There are two "inverted" asserts which expect the incorrect number of fired
rules and the corrupted score. Their purpose is to make sure that the original bug is
still reproducible. This was important for me while I was searching for minimal reproducer
but I admit it is confusing to see the test pass.
The two inverted asserts are marked with a comment and the expected values should be 4
rules and "0hard/-1soft" score, which are exactly the same values as at the very
end of the test. Let me know if this explanation is enough or if you need further
assistance. I can even make the test not use optaplanner-core at all.
Stateful working memory regression OCT-2016: nurserostering
long_hint01.xml
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DROOLS-1326
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1326
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core engine
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta2
Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet
Assignee: Mario Fusco
Priority: Blocker
Attachments: screenshot-1.png
Something regressed in Drools master between 27-SEP and 11-OCT.
See:
https://kie-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/optaplanner-turtl...
I 'll ask [~jlocker] to isolate.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)