[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-318?page=all ] Edson Tirelli reopened JBRULES-318: ----------------------------------- Hi, Thanks for having fixed this. Unfortunately, I think that I am facing a regression when using the same example (just use the conditions under comment "Works great"): rule "Order" salience 200 when #Works great n1 : NumberTest($nb1 : nb, $index1 : index); n2 : NumberTest($nb2 : nb -> ($nb2.compareTo($nb1) < 0), index > $index1); then System.out.println("Swapping " + n1 + " with " + n2); check(n1, n2); swap(n1, n2); modify(n1); modify(n2); end I got an error in the middle of the test (using 3.0.2), which wasn't the case with 3.0.1. Did I made a mistake writing my rules, or is it a regression? Swapping N[4] index=1 with N[3] index=2 Swapping N[3] index=1 with N[2] index=3 Swapping N[2] index=1 with N[1] index=4 Swapping N[1] index=1 with N[0] index=5 Swapping N[4] index=2 with N[1] index=5 Swapping N[2] index=4 with N[1] index=2 Shouldn't come here... false Swapping N[3] index=3 with N[1] index=4 Swapping N[2] index=2 with N[1] index=3 Number is N[0] index=1 Number is N[1] index=2 Number is N[2] index=3 Number is N[3] index=4 Number is N[4] index=5 Thanks, Jean-Pierre Grillon -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira