[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Darran Lofthouse commented on WFCORE-840:
-----------------------------------------
What I still don't understand is why the attribute definition needs to contain the
dependent capability. The resource has already declared the capabilities it provides so
those should automatically be used as the dependent capability IMO.
Improve API on AttributeDefinitions where a capability is
referenced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFCORE-840
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-840
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 2.0.0.Alpha11
Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
Assignee: Tomaz Cerar
Fix For: 2.0.0.CR1
Take the following method call defining an attribute: -
{code}
.setCapabilityReference(PROVIDERS_CAPABILITY, SASL_SERVER_FACTORY_CAPABILITY, true)
{code}
This definition says this attribute references something which provides the
PROVIDERS_CAPABILITY.
However it also states that the resource that contains this attributes provides the
SASL_SERVER_FACTORY_CAPABILITY.
Really what the resource provides is not directly related to this attribute definition.
The following pull request has already improved on registering in advance what capability
a resource can provide: -
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/909
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)