[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-5811) Clustering performance regression in scenarios with ASYNC cache used
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2026 -----
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2025 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Paul Ferraro commented on WFLY-5811:
------------------------------------
[~matlach] In WF10, you should only see multiple write commands when using ATTRIBUTE
(a.k.a. fine) granularity (as we use a cache entry per attribute). Otherwise, i.e. when
using SESSION granularity, the resulting cache put only happens once per batch. See:
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/clustering/web/infinispan/...
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/clustering/ee/infinispan/s...
It's possible that this optimization didn't exist in 8.2.x - I honestly can't
remember. As far as EAP7 vs WF10 - there is no difference in behavior.
Clustering performance regression in scenarios with ASYNC cache used
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-5811
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5811
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Clustering
Reporter: Michal Vinkler
Assignee: Paul Ferraro
Fix For: 10.1.0.Final
Our clustering write-heavy stress tests show a performance drop of 7.0.0.ER2 bits
compared to 6.4.0 bits, when using ASYNC cache.
Compare these results:
stress-ejbremote-dist-async
7.0.0.ER2:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
6.4.0.GA:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
stress-ejbremote-repl-async
7.0.0.ER2:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
6.4.0.GA:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
stress-ejbservlet-repl-async
7.0.0.ER2:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
6.4.0.GA:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
stress-session-repl-async
7.0.0.ER2:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
6.4.0.GA:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
stress-session-dist-async
7.0.0.ER2:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
6.4.0.GA:
[throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
Also, load scenarios, which use a stable load of 4000 sessions are affected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
3736
days inactive
3736
days old
0 comments
1 participants
tags (0)
participants (1)
-
Paul Ferraro (JIRA)