[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Yacine Jaber commented on DROOLS-702:
-------------------------------------
Hi David,
Thank you for your answer. I though that even if we use the same fact on the parent &
child rule, the evaluation will be made on these two rules.
It's could be interesting to mention this case on documentation (7.8.5. Conditional
named consequences).
The unification works as expected. Can you tell me which solution is strong (Unification
or from)?
Rule Inheritance fired the sub rule even the condition doen't
match
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DROOLS-702
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-702
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 6.1.0.Final
Environment: Windows, Java6.0.29
Reporter: Yacine Jaber
Assignee: Davide Sottara
Priority: Critical
Attachments: wod-drools-test.7z
You can find the attached a simple maven project that shows this error.
You can run ExampleDrools class as main java application.
The sub rules are fired even if the condition is not matched.
There are a work arround by using <from $fact> into a sub rule to avoid firing this
one.
This simple project shows the failed and work arround test.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)