[
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Toshiya Kobayashi commented on DROOLS-4956:
-------------------------------------------
Also note that if you have 2 rules
{code:java}
Person( "Toshiya" == name )
{code}
{code:java}
Person( name == "Toshiya")
{code}
, node sharing doesn't work for them.
Normarize rule constraints for property reactivity and indexing
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DROOLS-4956
URL:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4956
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core engine, executable model
Affects Versions: 7.31.0.Final
Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
Assignee: Toshiya Kobayashi
Priority: Major
Having a constraint like
{code:java}
Person(name == $customer)
{code}
is not really the same thing as
{code:java}
Person($customer == name)
{code}
In the second case not only you don't have property reactivity, but also you
don't have indexing. This an inconsistent behaviour and hoping to fix it with a
"normalization" phase where the second constraint got rewritten like the first
before being analyzed by property reactivity and indexing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)