[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Sande Gilda updated WFLY-10916:
-------------------------------
Description:
The documentation for the `undertow.filter-ref.priority` in the undertow subsystem [1]
suggests a filter with a higher number (e.g. 2) is executed before a filter with a lower
number (e.g. 1). It appears to be the opposite.
"Defines filter order. It should be set to 1 or more. A higher number instructs the
server to be included earlier in the handler chain than others under the same
context."
[1]
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_jboss_enterprise_ap...
was:
The documentation on the filter-ref attribute 'priority' in the undertow subsystem
[1] suggests a filter with a higher number (e.g. 2) is executed before a filter with a
lower number (e.g. 1). It appears to be the opposite.
"Defines filter order. It should be set to 1 or more. A higher number instructs the
server to be included earlier in the handler chain than others under the same
context."
[1]
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_jboss_enterprise_ap...
Error in description of priority attribute in filter-ref attributes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-10916
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10916
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Web (Undertow)
Reporter: Sande Gilda
Assignee: Stuart Douglas
Priority: Minor
The documentation for the `undertow.filter-ref.priority` in the undertow subsystem [1]
suggests a filter with a higher number (e.g. 2) is executed before a filter with a lower
number (e.g. 1). It appears to be the opposite.
"Defines filter order. It should be set to 1 or more. A higher number instructs the
server to be included earlier in the handler chain than others under the same
context."
[1]
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_jboss_enterprise_ap...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)