[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on DROOLS-247:
------------------------------------------------
Mario Fusco <mfusco(a)redhat.com> made a comment on [bug
1021803|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021803]
Positional and/or unification constraints are interpreted as either bindings
or constraints, depending on the whether the variable is already bound or not. The user is
expected not to have to care about the difference.
...
Person( $name; $age := age )
...
If the pattern type is @propertyReactive, however, the actual decision
between binding and constraint WILL make a difference, possibly forcing
the user to use @watch()
Property reactivity does not work with positional/unification
constraints
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DROOLS-247
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-247
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Enhancement
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 5.5.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR2
Reporter: Davide Sottara
Assignee: Mario Fusco
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 5.5.1.Final, 6.0.0.Final
Positional and/or unification constraints are interpreted as either bindings
or constraints, depending on the whether the variable is already bound or not. The user
is expected not to have to care about the difference.
...
Person( $name; $age := age )
...
If the pattern type is @propertyReactive, however, the actual decision
between binding and constraint WILL make a difference, possibly forcing
the user to use @watch()
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira