]
Paul Ferraro commented on WFLY-5835:
------------------------------------
[~mvinkler] This looks fine. See my 1st comment. You cannot compare EAP6 w/EAP7 using
ASYNC in any meaningful way - you can only do that with SYNC.
Mean response times in soak test exceed 1000 milliseconds
---------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-5835
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5835
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Clustering
Affects Versions: 10.0.0.CR4
Reporter: Michal Vinkler
Assignee: Paul Ferraro
The responses in soak test reach really high values (hundreds of ms) compared to EAP 6
(max 10 ms). Also number of unhealthy samples (samples which arrive later than in 3
seconds) is really high in EAP7 run compared to 0 unhealthy samples in EAP6 run.
EAP7 run also logs few sampling errors in almost each iteration, EAP6 did not.
Compare these results:
EAP7:
[
performance.txt|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7...]
(example:
response min: 0 ms, mean: 965 ms, max: 16034 ms, sampling errors: 5, unhealthy samples:
86209)
EAP6:
[
performance.txt|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6...]
(example:
response min: 0 ms, mean: 6 ms, max: 1053 ms, sampling errors: 0, unhealthy samples: 0)