[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-4491) Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
3:41 p.m.
Brian Stansberry created AS7-4491:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:20 p.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Kabir Khan reassigned AS7-4491:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Kabir Khan (was: Brian Stansberry)
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:20 p.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Kabir Khan commented on AS7-4491:
---------------------------------
Need to check with Heiko Braun first
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:22 p.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Kabir Khan edited comment on AS7-4491 at 4/19/12 3:22 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------
Need to check with Heiko Braun first (Heiko Rupp is fine with it).
If we go ahead it is a change in DomainFinalResultHandler
was (Author: kabirkhan):
Need to check with Heiko Braun first
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:24 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun commented on AS7-4491:
----------------------------------
We (console) currently don't rely it. Please go ahead.
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:34 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun updated AS7-4491:
-----------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: We (console) currently don't rely it. Please go ahead.)
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
8:20 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun commented on AS7-4491:
----------------------------------
I re-opened this issue because i can see two different response formats on the same
operation:
{noformat}
[INFO] staging-one > {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "result" => {"step-1" => {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "response-headers" => {"operation-requires-restart"
=> true}
[INFO] }}
[INFO] }
{noformat}
{noformat}
[INFO] server-one > {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "result" => {"step-1" => {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "response-headers" => {"operation-requires-restart"
=> true}
[INFO] }},
[INFO] "response-headers" => {"process-state" =>
"restart-required"}
[INFO] }
{noformat}
it happens when setting the transaction manager attribute "enable-statistics".
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
8:22 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun edited comment on AS7-4491 at 4/24/12 9:21 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
See the missing "response-headers" attributes on the first operation response?
In both cases I perform the same operation against the same subsystem.
was (Author: heiko.braun):
See the missing "response-headers" attributes on the first operation
response?
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
8:22 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun commented on AS7-4491:
----------------------------------
See the missing "response-headers" attributes on the first operation response?
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
9:46 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Brian Stansberry commented on AS7-4491:
---------------------------------------
What's the operation?
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10:16 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Kabir Khan commented on AS7-4491:
---------------------------------
Are these on different HCs? Can you please post the full output?
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12:08 p.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Kabir Khan reassigned AS7-4491:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Brian Stansberry (was: Kabir Khan)
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12:08 p.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Kabir Khan commented on AS7-4491:
---------------------------------
The current output for the work I am doing on http://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4468, I
end up with the following output. kabirs-macbook-pro.local is the slave, and misses the
response headers.
{code}
[domain@localhost:9999 /] /socket-binding-group=full-sockets:remove
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined,
"server-groups" => {"main-server-group" => {"host"
=> {
"kabirs-macbook-pro.local" => {
"server-one" => {"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}},
"server-two" => {"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}}
},
"master" => {
"server-one" => {"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"response-headers" => {
"operation-requires-restart" => true,
"process-state" => "restart-required"
}
}},
"server-two" => {"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"response-headers" => {
"operation-requires-restart" => true,
"process-state" => "restart-required"
}
}}
}
}}}
}
{code}
The slave-> server-one/-two communication is handled via ProxyStepHandler, which gets
the correct results from the server:
{code}
{
"outcome" => "success",
"response-headers" => {
"operation-requires-restart" => true,
"process-state" => "restart-required"
}
}
{code}
However it has no way of propagating that back in the OperationContext, only the result.
So once the the slave ModelController is done with the operation, the results sent back to
the master are:
{code}
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
{code}
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Kabir Khan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
1:28 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun commented on AS7-4491:
----------------------------------
yes, it the slave ("staging") on my machine that doesn't have the reposne
headers as well. here is the full request/response:
{noformat}
[INFO] {
[INFO] "operation" => "composite",
[INFO] "address" => [],
[INFO] "steps" => [{
[INFO] "address" => [
[INFO] ("profile" => "full"),
[INFO] ("subsystem" => "transactions")
[INFO] ],
[INFO] "operation" => "write-attribute",
[INFO] "name" => "enable-statistics",
[INFO] "value" => true
[INFO] }]
[INFO] }
[INFO] {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "result" => {"step-1" => {"outcome" =>
"success"}},
[INFO] "server-groups" => {"main-server-group" =>
{"host" => {
[INFO] "master" => {"server-two" =>
{"response" => {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "result" => {"step-1" => {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "response-headers" =>
{"operation-requires-restart" => true}
[INFO] }},
[INFO] "response-headers" => {"process-state" =>
"restart-required"}
[INFO] }}},
[INFO] "staging" => {"staging-three" =>
{"response" => {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "result" => {"step-1" => {
[INFO] "outcome" => "success",
[INFO] "response-headers" =>
{"operation-requires-restart" => true}
[INFO] }}
[INFO] }}}
[INFO] }}}
[INFO] }
{noformat}
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
1:28 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun commented on AS7-4491:
----------------------------------
why has the issue been closed again?
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3:09 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun updated AS7-4491:
-----------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: why has the issue been closed again?)
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3:09 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Heiko Braun reopened AS7-4491:
------------------------------
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11:46 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Brian Stansberry resolved AS7-4491.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Done
I'm resolving this as the original issue is fixed. I've opened AS7-4645 to track
the missing response header problem, and am going after that now.
Structure of the "server-groups" node in a multi-server
operation response breaks if multiple hosts use the same server names
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-4491
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4491
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 7.1.2.Final-redhat1
See "Multi-Server Responses" on
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Management+API+reference#Manag...:
"server-groups" => {
"groupA" => {
"serverA-1" => {
"host" => "host1",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
},
"serverA-2" => {
"host" => "host2",
"response" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
}
},
....
What if on both hosts the server was named "serverA" ? The result for one would
replace the result for the other.
It's important to allow hosts to re-use server names, as this makes it practical to
re-use a host.xml across multiple installations; e.g. in single AMI used on many EC2
instances.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
5194
days inactive
5208
days old
17 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Brian Stansberry (JIRA) -
Heiko Braun (JIRA)
-
Kabir Khan (JIRA)