[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Brian Stansberry updated JBAS-5905:
-----------------------------------
JBoss Forum Reference:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=142147
Just in case, opened a forum thread to get input from JBM folks as to why this is this
way. But based on following chat w/ Bela, I'll add FD; if there's a reason not to,
it can always be removed for 5.0.0.GA.
[10:26:22] Brian Stansberry: can you imagine any reason to just have FD_SOCK and not FD in
a TCP-based stack?
[10:26:46] Bela Ban: No, not really
Validate why JBM's jbm-data Channel config doesn't have FD
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-5905
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5905
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Clustering, JMS (JBoss Messaging)
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: JBossAS-5.0.0.CR2
The jbm-data config only has FD_SOCK, need to check why it's not following the
standard practice.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira