[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Andy Caldwell commented on JGRP-1670:
-------------------------------------
Unfortunately we cannot afford to restart our jgroups cluster in order to add new devices,
the addition needs to be seamless, so I can't see a way to update A's view of
TCPPING.initial_hosts to include B. We are already using PDC to dynamically learn and
store the cluster members (thanks for adding that feature, it seems to make TCPPING much
more powerful), but it will only start helping in the case where A and B successfully
cluster at least once.
We chose to use TCPPING as the discovery mechanism since it is the one that ties us the
least into a particular network/cloud infrastructure:
PING/MPING/BPING require multicast/broadcast support which most clouds don't allow.
S3_PING/SWIFT_PING/AWS_PING/RACKSPACE_PING are all specific to a given cloud
TCPGOSSIP/JDBC_PING/FILE_PING require the addition of extra services to handle discovery,
adding complexity to the deployment, extra costs and potential single points of failure
(or even more complex orchestration)
TCPPING was also suggested to us by the Infinispan developers as being a good solution on
EC2.
Is there another discovery protocol we should be using? One that works across all IP
networks, with no single points of failure and no external service requirements?
Cluster doesn't heal after first discovery fails
------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1670
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1670
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.3.1
Environment: Ubuntu 12.04 on EC2 using OpenJDK 1.6.0_27 from the APT
repositories.
Reporter: Andy Caldwell
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 3.3.5, 3.4
When using TCPPING for discovery, if the very first attempt to discover the rest of the
cluster fails (in my case, the connections are timing out due to a suspected EC2 issue),
the new node decides that it is alone in the cluster and creates a new view of just
itself.
Later, when performing periodic discovery, the new node successfully connects to the
existing cluster and sends a GET_MBRS_REQ but, since it's already in a view (the one
where it's alone), it doesn't fill in its local IP address (see the logic or this
at
https://github.com/belaban/JGroups/blob/master/src/org/jgroups/protocols/...).
This means that the old nodes in the cluster cannot send a reply or any other cluster
messages to the new node. Thus the new node, which never get a response to its
GET_MBRS_REQ, continues to think it's alone in the world and the old members, who got
a record of a new cluster member but no address to communicate with it on, start logging
that they're dropping messages to <UUID> because they have no physical address.
The cluster never heals.
If the physical address were included in all GET_MBRS_REQ messages (e.g. if the if
statement were removed from the file I linked above), then, even if initial discovery
fails, future discovery would succeed and the cluster would heal itself.
This is a superficially similar issue to
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1203, but,
in that case, the cluster will heal once A performs a discovery later while in this one it
never heals.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira