June 2008 - jbossts-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-377) XAResourceRecord save/restore state insufficiently paranoid

by Jonathan Halliday (JIRA)

XAResourceRecord save/restore state insufficiently paranoid ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-377 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-377 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 4.3.0.GA Reporter: Jonathan Halliday Fix For: 4.4.CR2 The XAResourceRecord save state method writes meta-data into the objectstore before attempting to Serialize and write the actual bytes for an XAResource that it believes, on the basis of it implementing the market interface, is Serializable. If the serialization fails at runtime, the objectstore record is left in an invalid state and can cause the recovery pass to blow up in horrible ways. We should obtain the byte[] representing the serialized resource before writing anything to the record so that this does not occur. If serialization fails, the record will therefore be useless but at least not otherwise broken. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

14 years, 11 months

2
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-229) Configurable exception throwing for multi-threaded environment

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Configurable exception throwing for multi-threaded environment -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-229 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-229 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation, JTS Implementation Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Optional Currently if a thread A terminates a transaction in the same way as a thread B subsequently tries to, B will get an exception. This is to allow B to differentiate between it successfully terminating the transaction and someone else doing so. This comes from the OTS heritage. Maybe we should make it configurable, so deployments that couldn't care, can turn off that capability. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years

1
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-300) Move stale transaction logs

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Move stale transaction logs --------------------------- Key: JBTM-300 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-300 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Transaction Core Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Optional We should generalise the ExpiryScanner implementation of TopLevelTransaction in JTS so that logs that cannot be recovered after a set period of time are moved elsewhere for manual intervention. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 1 month

3
6
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-234) setRollbackOnly consistency

by Mark Little (JIRA)

setRollbackOnly consistency --------------------------- Key: JBTM-234 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-234 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP4 Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Optional OTS does not let you call rollback-only if the state of the transaction is not active. JTA doesn't make it clear whether or not that is an error. That makes it implementation dependent. At the moment both of our JTA implementations mask this issue. AS appears to not expect an exception from setRollbackOnly either, but that's may cause an issue if someone uses a different JTA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 1 month

1
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-299) Xid pack should ignore trailing zeros

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Xid pack should ignore trailing zeros ------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-299 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-299 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP6 Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.6 It packs the whole array even if most of it is zeros. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 1 month

1
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-301) Failure to recover one XAResource in log fails to recover the rest

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Failure to recover one XAResource in log fails to recover the rest ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBTM-301 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-301 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation, Recovery Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4 If we can't get a new XAResource from a XAResourceRecovery then restore_state on XAResourceRecord fails, which causes the activate on the entire log to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 2 months

2
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-236) Timeout references microseconds for periodicity when it should be milliseconds

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Timeout references microseconds for periodicity when it should be milliseconds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBTM-236 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-236 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Documentation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP5 Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Minor -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 4 months

2
6
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-237) NORMAL mode for TransactionReaper sets checking period based on transaction timeout and not property

by Mark Little (JIRA)

NORMAL mode for TransactionReaper sets checking period based on transaction timeout and not property ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-237 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-237 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Transaction Core Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP5 Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little In the insert method the sleep period for the transaction reaper thread is continually modified to be based on the least timeout associated with the transaction added. This is fine for DYNAMIC mode, but is contrary to what NORMAL is supposed to do: scan based purely on the default scan timeout period specified in the configuration file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 4 months

2
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-226) Possible race condition between top-down and bottom-up recovery

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Possible race condition between top-down and bottom-up recovery --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-226 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-226 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP4 Environment: Mac OS X, JDK 1.4.2. Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Critical In local JTA recovery for non-serializable XAResources, the XAResourceRecovery implementation is needed to obtain a new XAResource. If a new resource isn't obtained (because the XAResourceRecovery instances haven't all been triggered yet), top-down recovery retries on subsequent recovery sweeps. Meanwhile, bottom up recovery can kick in and use an XAResource from a XAResourceRecovery that is now available and fail to locate any information on the transaction that will drive it top-down. Upon failing to find the transaction, it uses presumed abort and rolls back the instance, when in fact it should wait and commit it. But it doesn't do that until several phases have passed, and in which case most of the time top-down recovery will have re-run, found the XAResource and committed the transaction. I'm fairly sure this is a race condition and does exist, but am still checking. Work around exists at the moment though. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 4 months

3
9
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-298) There is no way for recovery through JCA to indicate temporary failure to recover

by Mark Little (JIRA)

There is no way for recovery through JCA to indicate temporary failure to recover --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-298 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-298 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP5 Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Fix For: 4.4 This means client-driven recovery sees a failure to recover and doesn't try again. We should give a "try again later" option (XA_RETRY). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

15 years, 4 months

2
5
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

jbossts-issues June 2008