Not really... all solutions are variations of this. :(
We do intent to develop things equivalent to SQL group by, unique, etc
clauses... but no such feature today.
[]s
Edson
2008/1/29, cfili <cfilippelli(a)cerner.com>:
>
>
> Yeah I tried your first suggestion and ran into the duplication. I'd
> rather
> not create a new fact for each one of these... any other way of avoiding
> it?
>
>
> Edson Tirelli-3 wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, my previous suggestion will count the same process name
> multiple
> > times. There are a few ways to avoid it. I would probably use a helper
> > fact:
> >
> > rule XYZ
> > when
> > $p : Process( $name : name )
> > not( ProcessCount( name == $name ) )
> > Number( $count : intValue) from accumulate(
> > $i : Process( name == $name, this != $p ),
> > count( $i ) )
> > then
> > System.out.println( "There are "+$count+" instances of
processes
> > named "+$name );
> > insert( new ProcessCount( $name, $count ) );
> > end
> >
> >
> > Hope it helps,
> > Edson
> >
> > 2008/1/29, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >> Try that:
> >>
> >> rule XYZ
> >> when
> >> $p : Process( $name : name )
> >> Number( $count : intValue) from accumulate(
> >> $i : Process( name == $name, this != $p ),
> >> count( $i ) )
> >> then
> >> System.out.println( "There are "+$count+" instances of
processes
> named
> >> "+$name );
> >> end
> >>
> >> []s
> >> Edson
> >>
> >>
> >> 2008/1/29, cfili <cfilippelli(a)cerner.com>:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I am having a hard time finding an example of what I am trying to
> do,
> >> so
> >> > maybe someone here could help me. What I am trying to do is
> determine
> >> > how
> >> > many facts fall into the same category.
> >> >
> >> > My facts are 'processes' and one of their attributes is a
'name'.
> My
> >> > goal
> >> > is to determine how many processes with the same name are
> running. The
> >> > problem is I do not know ahead of time the process names available,
> I
> >> > want
> >> > to determine that set at runtime. Also, once I determine the count
> for
> >> > a
> >> > given name, I do not want to run it again for the other processes
> that
> >> > fall
> >> > in that name category.
> >> >
> >> > I think "from collect" is probably what I want to use here,
but I am
> >> not
> >> > sure how to grab the names in my Pattern from the fact I am
> currently
> >> > iterating on.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >
http://www.nabble.com/Count-matching-facts-tp15160392p15160392.html
> >> > Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > rules-users mailing list
> >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Edson Tirelli
> >> JBoss Drools Core Development
> >> Office: +55 11 3529-6000
> >> Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
> >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Edson Tirelli
> > JBoss Drools Core Development
> > Office: +55 11 3529-6000
> > Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/Count-matching-facts-tp15160392p15163614.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users