Re: [rules-users] Ignore subsequent conditions in a Decision Table based on previous condition

Hi, I'm new to Drools and I'm implementing rules using Excel decision tables and I need some of your help. I have some rules in which depending on a condition the following condition is not necessary, how can I define a table that akllows to define this? For instance I have: CONDITION CONDITION CONDITION ACTION Y result1 N N Y result2 N N N result3 N Y N result4 N Y Y result5 In the example above (I hope you can see it right) if the first condition value is Y the other 2 conditions values don't matter and despite their value the result will always be the same. I wouldn't want to have to write all the possible combinations as these in the real case will add a lot of complexity to the tables. How can I accomplish this? Is it possible to do it in Excel? If not, how can I do it in another way (for instantance with guvnor web-based tables). -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Ignore-subsequent-conditions-in-a-Decis... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users