Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

Indeed, that's what I need. General use case would be to have a "parent" drools engine on a fat server, and small clips based rule engines - knowing at least the parts of the process they have to care about. I was also looking into rule exchange between those two, but it seems W3C rule exchange in it's current state is not really useful. ________________________________________ Von: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] im Auftrag von Wolfgang Laun [wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Mai 2013 18:11 An: Rules Users List Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules On 31 May 2013 13:44, Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: On 31 May 2013, at 07:43, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com<mailto:wolfgang.laun@gmail.com>> wrote: yeah the LHS isn't so had, if they stick to simple patterns, the RHS is a whole different kettle of fish :) You can load the RHS into an antlr based java.g grammar, and try and translate it - but it wouldn't be fun. So probably best first to stick to clp->drl, which is more straight forward. Besides, once you are on DRL, why would you want to go back to CLP :) OP's primary intention seemed to be a DRL to CLP translator, which - according to your first answer - was classified to be a simple copy/paste endeavour. Not so. -W Mark _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users