Sorry Edson ... I can't declare the fact type with the parameter
@role( event ) in guvnor throw creating a declarative model :( could
you explain it better?
I don't believe the tooling in Guvnor supports that yet,
you'll have to
use the DRL directly.
Mark
2009/4/2 Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com <mailto:tirelli@post.com>>
Declare your fact type with @role( event ).
2009/4/2 Nestor Tarin Burriel <nestabur(a)gmail.com
<mailto:nestabur@gmail.com>>
And how can I create events from guvnor?
2009/4/2 Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com
<mailto:tirelli@post.com>>
Need to fix the error message, but it seems you are
trying to use the sliding window on regular facts...
sliding window only makes sense for events...
Also, the property you are using to set the event
processing mode seems wrong. Check here:
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
[]s
Edson
2009/4/2 nestabur <nestabur(a)gmail.com
<mailto:nestabur@gmail.com>>
Hi All,
I'm trying to use sliding windows with guvnor, I
deploy the package in my
rule engine as:
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put("url", rulePackagePath);
props.put("eventProcessingMode",
"stream");
agent = RuleAgent.newRuleAgent(props);
session =
agent.getRuleBase().newStatefulSession();
When I insert a fact into the working memory as:
session.insert(fact);
session.fireAllRules();
I get the following error:
Exception while processing message:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.drools.common.DefaultFactHandle cannot be cast to
org.drools.common.EventFactHandle
java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.drools.common.DefaultFactHandle cannot be
cast to org.drools.common.EventFactHandle
at
org.drools.rule.SlidingTimeWindow.updateNextExpiration(SlidingTimeWindow.java:192)
at
org.drools.rule.SlidingTimeWindow.assertRightTuple(SlidingTimeWindow.java:119)
at
org.drools.rule.BehaviorManager.assertRightTuple(BehaviorManager.java:87)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ExistsNode.assertObject(ExistsNode.java:172)
at
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.doPropagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:366)
at
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:349)
at
org.drools.reteoo.AlphaNode.assertObject(AlphaNode.java:147)
at
org.drools.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:42)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.assertObject(ObjectTypeNode.java:184)
at
org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:146)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1066)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1022)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:810)
at
com.s2grupo.triton.service.impl.CorrelatorServiceImpl.insertFact(CorrelatorServiceImpl.java:64)
at
com.s2grupo.triton.jms.impl.JmsMessageListenerImpl.onMessage(JmsMessageListenerImpl.java:67)
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageConsumer.dispatch(ActiveMQMessageConsumer.java:1021)
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSessionExecutor.dispatch(ActiveMQSessionExecutor.java:122)
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSessionExecutor.iterate(ActiveMQSessionExecutor.java:192)
at
org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner.runTask(PooledTaskRunner.java:122)
at
org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner$1.run(PooledTaskRunner.java:43)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
What I'm missing? Is it a bug? I'm using the
5.0.0.SNAPSHOT version of
drools.
Thanks,
NEStor
ober0n wrote:
>
> Hi Ed, thanks for the quick reply, I will try the
temporal constraints as
> well.
>
> I haven't completed my testing yet but the sliding
windows seems to be
> working. Thanks!
>
> I am getting a strange problem of my program
hanging. It gets all the way
> past my "dispose()" of the StatefulKnowledgeSession
and closing the
> session logger and to the end of my main(). Then it
just sits there. I'm
> thinking it's a bug in my rules but wanted to make
sure this wasn't a
> feature of Streams (maybe some thread kicked off to
accept facts or
> something).
>
> If you could just confirm nothing in Drools fusion
is supposed to continue
> running, that would be great.
>
> Here are the significant snippets of my code:
> ...
> WorkingMemoryEntryPoint eventStream =
> ksession.getWorkingMemoryEntryPoint( "EventStream" );
> ...
> eventStream.insert(goodbye_message);
> Thread.sleep(10000);
> eventStream.insert(hello_message);
> ksession.fireAllRules();
> ksession.dispose();
> logger.close();
> } catch (Throwable t) {
> t.printStackTrace();
> }
> } // end main() <-- tracing through the code, I get
past the end of
> main() then see a "Source not found." in the Eclipse
debugger which seems
> to be looking for "Thread.exit() line: 604"
>
>
> The updated rule:
>
> declare Message
> @role( event )
> end
>
> rule "Hello World"
> when
> Message( status == Message.HELLO )
from entry-point "EventStream"
> exists(Message( status ==
Message.GOODBYE ) over window:time( 4s ) from
> entry-point "EventStream")
> then
>
>
System.out.println("**************************************************");
> System.out.println( "There was a
GOODBYE message near the HELLO
> message." );
>
>
System.out.println("**************************************************");
> end
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Edson Tirelli-3 wrote:
>>
>> Although your rule should work, the best way to
write your rule would
>> be
>> using temporal constraints instead of sliding windows:
>>
>> rule "Goodbye before Hello World"
>> when
>> $m : Message( status == Message.HELLO )
>> exists( Message( status ==
Message.GOODBYE, this
>> before[0s,3s] $m ) )
>> then
>> System.out.println( "There was a
GOODBYE message before
>> the
>> HELLO
>> message." );
>> end
>>
>> Using "before" operator is not only much
cheaper (in terms of used
>> resources) than sliding windows, but it also allow
the engine to reason
>> over
>> the temporal constraints looking for special cases,
like when you use
>> negative patterns.
>>
>> I will look further into your case to check if
I missed anything on
>> the
>> sliding windows support, but using STREAM mode
should work.
>>
>> If you can open a JIRA for me to raise a
compilation error when
>> compiling sliding windows using CLOUD mode, I
appreciate. This will allow
>> you to follow up my progress.
>>
>> []s
>> Edson
>>
>>
>> 2009/3/30 ober0n <lili339(a)hotmail.com
<mailto:lili339@hotmail.com>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ed, no need to apologize, you have been
invaluable in my first steps
>>> towards Drooling :-D so thanks for all your help,
it is GREATLY
>>> appreciated
>>> :clap:.
>>>
>>> We have a few scenarios in mind but aren't really
implementing them yet,
>>> just trying to see if sliding windows works the
way we think it does. In
>>> the
>>> simple rule I wrote above, I basically want to
check if two facts are
>>> temporally close.
>>>
>>> Yes, you are correct. I didn't pay enough
attention to the manual and
>>> didn't
>>> use STREAM mode to enter in my facts. I will use
the manual insertion
>>> process found in "Example 2.10. Inserting facts
into an entry point" of
>>> section "2.3. Streams Support" to update my code.
And, I will update my
>>> rule
>>> to specify a "from entry-point <Specific
Stream>".
>>>
>>> Also, could you comment on the simple rule I am
using? Does it look like
>>> it
>>> should work after I do the updates? Or is my logic
incorrect?
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ober0n,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay on answering. I am on a trip
with limited internet
>>> connection.
>>> I am interested in your experience with the
sliding windows, since the
>>> tests are working. Maybe it is a scenario not
covered by the tests.
>>>
>>> In any case, what is probably happening is that
you are not
>>> configuring
>>> the engine to work in STREAM mode. The default
mode is CLOUD and it does
>>> not
>>> support sliding windows. It seems the engine is
silently failing in this
>>> case, when the compiler raise an error to warn the
user.
>>>
>>> I just committed some docs on this subject:
>>>
>>>
>>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>>>
>>> (plz, wait for hudson to rebuild the docs or
build docs yourself).
>>>
>>> Feedback welcome. I will complement the sliding
window docs.
>>>
>>> []s
>>> Edson
>>>
>>> 2009/3/29 ober0n <lili339(a)hotmail.com
<mailto:lili339@hotmail.com>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Still trying to get sliding windows to work
(basing my code off of the
>>> > Eclipse supplied "Hello World" example). I
don't
think I fully
>>> understand
>>> > how it works yet so I'm trying to simplify
things even further by
>>> writing
>>> > a
>>> > simple rule that is meant to say:
>>> >
>>> > if (current_message = "Hello" AND exists(
goodbye_message within
>>> > sliding_window(3 seconds) ))
>>> > then print("There was a GOODBYE message before
the HELLO message." )
>>> >
>>> > In other words: This rule should fire if the
current Hello World
>>> message
>>> > was
>>> > preceeded within 3 seconds by a goodbye message.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > I wrote a new rule for this:
>>> >
>>> > declare Message
>>> > @role( event )
>>> > end
>>> >
>>> > rule "Goodbye before Hello World"
>>> > when
>>> > Message( status == Message.HELLO )
>>> > exists( Message( status ==
Message.GOODBYE ) over
>>> > window:time( 3s ) )
>>> > then
>>> > System.out.println( "There was a
GOODBYE message before
>>> the
>>> > HELLO
>>> > message." );
>>> > end
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > To send the messages: (ksession is a
StatefulKnowledgeSession)
>>> >
>>> > ...
>>> >
ksession.insert(goodbye_message);
>>> > ksession.fireAllRules();
>>> >
>>> > Thread.sleep(5000);
>>> >
>>> >
ksession.insert(hello_message);
>>> > ksession.fireAllRules();
>>> > ...
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > I expect to get nothing back since I sent the
Hello message 5 seconds
>>> > after
>>> > the goodbye message (outside the sliding window
of 3 seconds). But,
>>> for
>>> > some
>>> > reason the rule fires and I get one:
>>> >
>>> > "There was a GOODBYE message before the HELLO
message."
>>> >
>>> > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> > --
>>> > View this message in context:
>>> >
>>>
http://www.nabble.com/Trying-to-get-Sliding-Windows-to-work-tp22735051p22...
>>> > Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive
at
Nabble.com.
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Edson Tirelli
>>> JBoss Drools Core Development
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
<
http://www.jboss.com>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>>
http://www.nabble.com/Trying-to-get-Sliding-Windows-to-work-tp22735051p22...
>>> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive
at
Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Edson Tirelli
>> JBoss Drools Core Development
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
<
http://www.jboss.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Trying-to-get-Sliding-Windows-to-work-tp22735051p22...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
<
http://www.jboss.com>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com <
http://www.jboss.com>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users