June 2014 - rules-users - Jboss List Archives

Is there an option to import the drl file in kie-drools-wb-distribution-6.0.1.Final version UI?

by LaKhI ReDdY!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi, Can we import the drl file in kie-drools-wb-distribution-6.0.1.Final version, I see only create the DRL option and not import option? AUTHORING -> PROJECT AUTHORING - > NEW ITEM -> DRL File Is there an option to import the drl file? Regards, Lakshmi Reddy

11 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

Can we user RDBMS in BRMS 6.0.1 version?

by LaKhI ReDdY!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi , I am using kie-drools-wb-distribution-6.0.1.Final. I see that,In this version of BRMS,it stores all the rule/packages/assets/DRL's in Git repository not in RDBMS, Please confirm on this? In case if we can use RDBMS like Guvnor 5.1.1/5.3.3.Final in 6.0.1.Final version, please let me know how to setup to RDBMS in BRMS 6.0.1 version? Regards, lakhi

11 years, 10 months

2
2
0 / 0

Is there an option to import the drl file in kie-drools-wb-distribution-6.0.1.Final version UI?

by LaKhI ReDdY!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi, Can we import the drl file in kie-drools-wb-distribution-6.0.1.Final version, I see only create the DRL option and not import option? AUTHORING -> PROJECT AUTHORING - > NEW ITEM -> DRL File Is there an option to import the drl file? Regards, lakhi

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Drools Fusion - Intersection Of Events

by code4dc

Hey guys, I am using the Drools Fusion temporal parameters to try to detect if two events have *any* overlap between the two of them. Can anyone suggest the cleanest way to do this using the temporal parameters? Currently I am comparing the two events using 'overlaps', 'overlappedby', 'includes' and I feel like I am still missing a few cases. Can anyone suggest how to perform this check in the cleanest way possible? Thanks Eugene -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Fusion-Intersection-Of-Events-tp... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

OptaPlanner mailing list split off

by Geoffrey De Smet

Hi, The OptaPlanner mailing list has been split off from the Drools mailing list, at the request of several users, to keep the verbosity of this mailing lists down. If you have a question about OptaPlanner, now use these URL's: - Ask a usage question on StackOverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/optaplanner - To start a discussion, use the OptaPlanner developer forum: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/optaplanner-dev (or mail directly to optaplanner-dev(a)googlegroups.com) For more information, see optaplanner.org: http://www.optaplanner.org/community/forum.html http://www.optaplanner.org/community/droolsPlannerRenamed.html With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet OptaPlanner lead

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fwd: Regarding drools 6 workbench

by Michael Anstis

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ganesh Neelekani <ganeshneelekani(a)gmail.com> Date: 26 June 2014 06:35 Subject: Re: Regarding drools 6 workbench I am facing some strange issue if you use webservice "Unknown kieSession name:ksession-rules if use @webservice", Do I need to change code if you I use webservice Please follow up in below link http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/quot-Unknown-KieSession-name-ksession-r... Thanking you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- With regards. Ganesh N Neelekani

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Searching for an object in a list inside a map

by Steinmetz, Jean-Philippe

Hello, I have a scenario where I have a rule that is searching for a particular object inside a list and the list is an entry in a hashmap. An example of the class structure looks something like this. class Player { String name; } class TeamRoster { // Maps team name to players Map<String, List<Player>> teams; } The goal of the rule is to activate when there is a player named John on the Dodgers team. I have tried writing rules a couple of ways but end up with errors using either approach. My first approach was the following: dialect "mvel" rule when $roster : TeamRoster() $player : Player(name == "John") from $roster.teams["Dodgers"] then ... end However this resulted in the following error: Unable to Analyse Expression $roster.teams["Dodgers"]: sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.ParameterizedTypeImpl cannot be cast to java.lang.Class] So I tried changing it up with the following... dialect "mvel" rule when $roster : TeamRoster() $player : Player(name == "John") eval($roster.teams["Dodgers"] contains $player then ... end This effectively yields the same error: Expression $roster.teams["Dodgers"] contains $player: sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.ParameterizedTypeImpl cannot be cast to java.lang.Class] Note I am using Drools 6.0.1.Final. Is this some sort bug or limitation with the rules parser? Assuming I cannot change the class structure how can I achieve what I need? Thanks in advance, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz

11 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

Any way to housekeep "Version History" of business rule assets using guvnor

by nelson.wan

Hello all, Using guvnor, all business rule assets have their own "version history" for every save changes. We hope to know if there is any way (version 5.6.0.final) to purge old version history, to avoid the list growing very large. Many thanks for your help. I am using: Drools 5.6.0.final JBoss EAP 6.2.0.GA Thanks, Nelson -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Any-way-to-housekeep-Version-History-of... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

Strange behaviour with maximumSecondsSpend termination in combination with PlanningVariableListener

by dBijkoo

When i use the maximumSecondsSpend termination variable in the solverconfig it doesnt always fully process the methods in the PlanningVariableListener<Entity>. Most of the time it gives me a solution with "semi" done shadow variables but not always. However when i change the termination to require a "scoreAttained" it always gives me a solution with the correct processed shadow variables. Any ideas why this might happen? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Strange-behaviour-with-maximumSecondsSp... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 10 months

2
3
0 / 0

Lock-on-active and FROM

by FrankVhh

Hello all It has been a while since I posted on this forum as I was assigned to other tasks for a while. Anyway, I have not forgotten about the source of knowledge that is this user forum! We are using Drools 5.3.0. In the expert manual, section 5.8.3.6.2, the odd behavior of lock-on-active and FROM is highlighted. However, we cannot reproduce this reported behaviour. See annex for .java file and drl file. In the documentation, it is sated that only one rule should fire, in the example and as we run it, we can get both rule activations to execute. Could anyone cast the bright light of explanation on this phenomenon? It would also be helpful if someone could provide us with some additional information about why you should expect only one rule to fire. Thank you very much for your time and highly appreciated explanations! Sample.drl <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030146/Sample.drl> DroolsTest.java <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030146/DroolsTest.java> -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Lock-on-active-and-FROM-tp4030146.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

rules-users June 2014