Re: [rules-users] Drools Salience and no-loop
No I am not using CEP and I didn't think STREAM mode made a difference. I am
just as perplexed as you on why this is happening. Could it be salience is
only respected in the same package(these are in different packages )? I am
just taking a stab in the dark at this point. I generated audit logs and it
can be seen that the removal rule activation is created first and executed
first(it looks like 75% of the time based on my test this occurs)
laune wrote
It's difficult to imagine that doing the same thing with equal facts in
identically configured sessions would create differing objects. And it
was the intent of my questions to unearth some irregularity, and to
narrow it down.
STREAM mode shouldn't matter as you aren't using windows, expiry
or other CEP features - or are you?
-W
On 9 March 2012 15:53, gboro54 <gboro54@> wrote:
> All sessions are against the same kBase. When I say replicate I mean I
> create
> 10000 separate Orders all the same way(same values for all properties). I
> have not tried to insert all into one session and fire but can try if
> this
> really makes a difference(though I am not sure why it should). I will add
> an
> update to 1 as well but again I am not sure why this would matter to a
> low
> ranking rule who does not care about the actual values from that rule
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Salience-and-no-loop-tp3812723p3...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@.jboss
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@.jboss
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Salience-and-no-loop-tp3812723p3...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.