Hi Chris,
since you mention to already have a support license for JBoss Enterprise
BRMS, the best place to ask these types of questions is at the excellent
JBoss Customer Support Portal (
https://access.redhat.com/home) where
your question will be handled under SLAs ensuring timely response and
continuous quality assurance monitoring of the same.
Just FYI, I believe the issue you are mentioning has been fixed in trunk
(see Jira
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2942) which should
make the fix available in the next BRMS 5.2 release. Please confirm with
the Red Hat support engineers through a support case as they are much
more knowledgeable on product releases, and direct any further questions
regarding the supported BRMS bits to them.
If there are any further issues that you would like to see prioritized
for the supported BRMS bits you are using, we will be glad to work with
you through the JBoss Customer Support Portal.
Thanks.
Tihomir
On 4/27/11 2:31 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote:
I am finding that the "salience" feature is acting very
erratically.
Some of my rules modify the working memory. So I would like them to
execute before the others that simply read the memory after
modification and report on certain data conditions that are left after
all modifications have happened.
The "modifying" rules have a salience of 5. The "reading" rules have
a
salience of 0.
Using the rules logging I can see activations of my modifying rules
being created and activations of the reading rules being created.
And I can see "reading" rules (with salience 0) being executed
/before/ "modifying" rules (with salience 5) even though no other
activations are being created in between them.
I am not using agenda groups or anything "fancy" like that.
Debugging through the code I can see the "MAIN" agenda group is a
queue organised as heap.
However, the order in which things happen is very non-deterministic
(presumably due to hashing or something like that) and I am finding it
very difficult to actually pin down an actual 100% reproducible case.
Is there any known problem with the salience mechanism?
I am using JBoss Rules 5.1.0 (with a support licence).
Chris Selwyn
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users