Re: [rules-users] Adding a custom operator to drools?

2) Also, I am wondering about the large number of nearly identical internal classes required for each operator.Is there a specific reason why such an operator has to be defined for each possible object type separately? Is this due to the way the InternalReadAccessor is called to map to the current datatype in an operator call? And why not just call cu, Michael PS: Some details about my project come once I find a bit of time to write them down coherently :-) _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users