Re: [rules-users] Drools and Clojure

Greg Barton schrieb: Thanks for confirming that. For now I know that I am doing it right by using eval and that this means that rules for typical Clojure objects will not benefit from some of the optimizations Drools usually can apply. Maybe it will change in the future. I think that if Maps become 1st class objects there could be a different Syntax, without using eval. At this point it is mostly interesting for me to get Drools working with Clojure together and concentrate on correctness. The goal is that users of my lib can use do all typical things people do with Drools without writing Java code. Everything, including the rules, would be written in Clojure. But of course it would be very interesting if the devs could indeed have Clojure in mind. I don't know how reusable the existing code is, for using Maps without the need for eval and with having the respective performance advantages. I understand that the looup of the value for a given key can not be optimized away. On my hardware get() is limited to "only" 1000 calls per msec and core. Reading a field from a POJO is faster. If I understand it correctly then the "problem" with eval is that it needs to be executed each time, and no clever caching can be done. So, eliminating that by having Maps being 1st class is what sounds interesting. When I refer to Maps and Clojure, then I talk about Maps having only very few key/value pairs, just like POJOs, and being immutable. This immutability may even be very helpful for optimization. It is guaranteed that a given object will never change. I hope the devs will find it okay if I make some concrete suggestions in the coming weeks. Sunny greetings, André -- Lisp is not dead. It’s just the URL that has changed: http://clojure.org/