Re: [rules-users] Rule Flow: Diverge/Converge Issue with one-to-many paths being exected
Swindells, Thomas wrote:
Can you split it into two separate diverges?
Diverge to B first and always follow the other path which then does the A
& C,
Similarly at the other end wait for A &C and then a second wait to add in
the condition for B.
Thomas
I am not sure I entirely follow your suggestion. A, B, & C could fire in any
combination, but always at least one.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rule-Flow-Diverge-Converge-Issue-with-o...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.